Page 160 - Read Online

19. Broca P. New observation of aphemia caused by a lesion of the 42. Cacciari C, Bolognini N, Senna I, Pellicciari MC, Miniussi C,
posterior half of the second and third left frontal convolutions. Bull Papagno C. Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences
Soc Anat Paris 1861;6:398‑407. preserve the motion component of the verb: a TMS study. Brain
20. Wernicke C. Der aphasische Symptomenkomplex. Breslau: Cohn Lang 2011;119:149‑57.
and Weigert; 1874. 43. Scorolli C, Jacquet PO, Binkofski F, Nicoletti R, Tessari A, Borghi AM.
21. Mugnaini D, Lassi S, La Malfa G, Albertini G. Internalizing correlates Abstract and concrete phrases processing differentially modulates
of dyslexia. World J Pediatr 2009;5:255‑64. cortico‑spinal excitability. Brain Res 2012;1488:60‑71.
22. Cogo‑Moreira H, Andriolo RB, Yazigi L, Ploubidis GB, Brandão 44. Acheson DJ, Hagoort P. Stimulating the brain’s language network:
de Ávila CR, Mari JJ. Music education for improving reading skills syntactic ambiguity resolution after TMS to the inferior frontal gyrus
in children and adolescents with dyslexia. Cochrane Database Syst and middle temporal gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci 2013;25:1664‑77.
Rev 2012;8:CD009133. 45. Goswami U. Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: three
23. Lopes J. Biologising reading problems: the specific case of dyslexia. challenges for research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2015;16:43‑54.
Contemp Soc Sci 2012; 7:215‑29. 46. Nelson JM, Lindstrom W, Foels PA. Test anxiety among college students
24. de Beer J, Engels J, Heerkens Y, van der Klink J. Factors influencing with specific reading disability (Dyslexia): nonverbal ability and working
work participation of adults with developmental dyslexia: a memory as predictors. J Learn Disabil 2015;48:422‑32.
systematic review. BMC Public Health 2014;14:77. 47. Hadzibeganovic T, van den Noort M, Bosch P, Perc M, van
25. Young AW. Methodological and theoretical bases of visual hemifield Kralingen R, Mondt K, Coltheart M. Cross‑linguistic neuroimaging
studies. In: Beaumont JG, editor. Divided Visual Field Studies of and dyslexia: a critical view. Cortex 2010;46:1312‑6.
Cerebral Organization. London: Academic Press; 1982. 48. Siegel LS. Perspectives on dyslexia. Paediatr Child Health
26. Ellis AW, Young AW, Anderson C. Modes of word recognition in the 2006;11:581‑7.
left and right cerebral hemispheres. Brain Lang 1988;35:254‑73. 49. Boets B, Op de Beeck HP, Vandermosten M, Scott SK, Gillebert CR,
27. Skarratt PA, Lavidor M. Magnetic stimulation of the left visual cortex Mantini D, Bulthe J, Sunaert S, Wouters J, Ghesquiere P. Intact
impairs expert word recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 2006;18:1749‑58. but less accessible phonetic representations in adults with dyslexia.
28. Ellis AW, Brooks J, Lavidor M. Evaluating a split fovea model of Science 2013;342:1251‑4.
visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual 50. Bruck M. Word‑recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses
fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea. of dyslexia. Dev Psychol 1990;26:439‑54.
Neuropsychologia 2005;43:1128‑37. 51. Shaywitz SE, Fletcher JM, Holahan JM, Shneider AE, Marchione KE,
29. Lavidor M, Hayes A, Shillcock R, Ellis AW. Evaluating a split Stuebing KK, Francis DJ, Pugh KR, Shaywitz BA. Persistence of
processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic dyslexia: the Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence.
neighborhood size. Brain Lang 2004;88:312‑20. Pediatrics 1999;104:1351‑9.
30. Ellis AW, Brysbaert M. Split fovea theory and the role of the 52. Shaywitz SE. Dyslexia. N Engl J Med 1998;338:307‑12.
two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence. 53. Habib M, Giraud K. Dyslexia. Handb Clin Neurol 2013;111:229‑35.
Neuropsychologia 2010;48:353‑65. 54. Joly‑Pottuz B, Mercier M, Leynaud A, Habib M. Combined auditory
31. Brysbaert M. The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal and articulatory training improves phonological deficit in children
vision: a factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word with dyslexia. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2008;18:402‑29.
recognition and object perception. Brain Lang 2004;88:259‑67. 55. Coslett HB, Monsul N. Reading with the right hemisphere: evidence
32. Hsiao JH, Shillcock R, Lavidor M. A TMS examination of semantic from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Lang 1994;46:198‑211.
radical combinability effects in Chinese character recognition. Brain 56. Frye RE, Rotenberg A, Ousley M, Pascual‑Leone A. Transcranial
Res 2006;1078:159‑67. magnetic stimulation in child neurology: current and future
33. Stoeckel C, Gough PM, Watkins KE, Devlin JT. Supramarginal gyrus directions. J Child Neurol 2008;23:79‑96.
involvement in visual word recognition. Cortex 2009;45:1091‑6. 57. Hoeft F, McCandliss BD, Black JM, Gantman A, Zakerani N,
34. Price CJ, Moore CJ, Humphreys GW, Wise RJ. Segregating semantic Hulme C, Lyytinen H, Whitfield‑Gabrieli S, Glover GH, Reiss AL,
from phonological processes during reading. J Cogn Neurosci Gabrieli JD. Neural systems predicting long‑term outcome in
1997;9:727‑33. dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:361‑6.
35. Nakamura K, Hara N, Kouider S, Takayama Y, Hanajima R, Sakai K, 58. Costanzo F, Menghini D, Caltagirone C, Oliveri M, Vicari S. How
Ugawa Y. Task‑guided selection of the dual neural pathways for to improve reading skills in dyslexics: the effect of high frequency
reading. Neuron 2006;52:557‑64. rTMS. Neuropsychologia 2013;51:2953‑9.
36. Tomasino B, Fink GR, Sparing R, Dafotakis M, Weiss PH. Action 59. Costanzo F, Menghini D, Caltagirone C, Oliveri M, Vicari S. High
verbs and the primary motor cortex: a comparative TMS study frequency rTMS over the left parietal lobule increases non‑word
of silent reading, frequency judgments, and motor imagery. reading accuracy. Neuropsychologia 2012;50:2645‑51.
Neuropsychologia 2008;46:1915‑26. 60. Gutchess A. Plasticity of the aging brain: new directions in cognitive
37. Hoffman P, Jefferies E, Lambon Ralph MA. Ventrolateral prefrontal neuroscience. Science 2014;346:579‑82.
cortex plays an executive regulation role in comprehension of 61. van den Noort M, Lim S, Bosch P. Recognizing the risks of brain
abstract words: convergent neuropsychological and repetitive TMS stimulation. Science 2014;346:1307.
evidence. J Neurosci 2010;30:15450‑6. 62. Thut G, Pascual‑Leone A. Integrating TMS with EEG: how and what
38. Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL. Where is the semantic for? Brain Topogr 2010;22:215‑8.
system? A critical review and meta‑analysis of 120 functional 63. Miniussi C, Thut G. Combining TMS and EEG offers new prospects
neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 2009;19:2767‑96. in cognitive neuroscience. Brain Topogr 2010;22:249‑56.
39. Manenti R, Cappa SF, Rossini PM, Miniussi C. The role of the
prefrontal cortex in sentence comprehension: an rTMS study. Cortex Cite this article as: Noort Mv, Struys E, Bosch P. Transcranial magnetic
2008;44:337‑44. stimulation research on reading and dyslexia: a new clinical intervention
40. Caplan D, Vijayan S, Kuperberg G, West C, Waters G, Greve D, technique for treating dyslexia?. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation
Dale AM. Vascular responses to syntactic processing: event‑related 2015;2(3):145-52.
fMRI study of relative clauses. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;15:26‑38. Source of Support: Nil. Conflict of Interest: No.
41. Hashimoto R, Sakai KL. Specialization in the left prefrontal cortex
for sentence comprehension. Neuron 2002;35:589‑97. Received: 05-11-2014; Accepted: 23-12-2014

152 Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation | Volume 2 | Issue 3 | July 15, 2015 Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation | Volume 2 | Issue 3 | July 15, 2015 PB