Page 772 - Read Online
P. 772

Page 8 of 10                                 de Divitiis et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:75  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.66

               meningioma. The rostral and caudal poles were identified; the tumor was debulked and dissected from
               the arachnoidal adherences. The dorsal dural attachment was visualized and the tumor was released. En
               bloc gross total resection was achieved with no intra-operative complications. The exoscope visualization
               provided excellent images quality, both during the extradural and intradural surgical steps. After initial
               positioning of the camera 30 cm above the surgical field, repositioning was never required. Zooming
               and focusing were adjusted after dural opening; zoom was further increased during tumor dissection.
               Histological diagnosis confirmed a WHO I spinal meningioma. Clinical and radiological follow-up at three
               months demonstrated total removal of the meningiomas and walking improvement. Further treatment for
               the other lesions is planned.


               CONCLUSION
               Vitom-3D has recently entered the field of neurosurgery and, in selected case, it represents an alternative
               visualization tool to the operating microscope. Working environment ergonomics and trainees learning
               experience are the most relevant benefits associated with the use of exoscope. The optical properties make
               it best suited for spinal procedures rather than intracranial surgery, both for degenerative diseases and
               tumors removal. In particular, spinal meningiomas removal under skin-to-skin Vitom-3D visualization
               only seems feasible, efficient, and safe. Indications to the use of Vitom-3D greatly depend on tumor size,
               consistency, relationship to surrounding neurovascular structures, and surgeon’s experience. Switching to
               the operating microscope, if deemed safer, should always be considered. Further studies, including larger
               homogenous series, are needed to better define advantages and limitations of the exoscope in meningiomas
               surgery as compared to the operating microscope.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contribution to conception of the study: de Divitiis O, Denaro L
               Prepared the manuscript draft: d’Avella E, Baro V
               Responsible for images and supplementary material: Sacco M, Somma T
               Critically revised the final version of the manuscript: de Divitiis O, Turgut M


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest. 


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not Applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.
   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777