Page 178 - Read Online
P. 178

De Aquino et al.                                                                                                                                              Esophageal mucosectomy in advanced achalasia

           Esophagogastrostomy leak was found in this technique   Functional asocial parameters had satisfactory
           in a rate similar to other series [14,21,23] . Leakage seems   outcomes as shown by weight gain, quality of life,
           not be linked to the resection procedure but to other   satisfaction and return to work.
           topics such as absence of serosa in the esophagus,
           deficient  vascularization,  constant  movement    In  conclusion,  esophageal  mucosectomy  and
           with  swallow,  and  low  nutrition  status  of  some    endomuscular pull-through seems to be a valuable
           patients [2,13,21,24] .                            alternative to esophagectomy in patients with end-
                                                              stage achalasia.
           The risk for bleeding in the muscular tunnel is small.
           All patients had hemodynamic stability after the   DECLARATIONS
           procedure and only few required transfusion. Parrilla
                       [7]
           Paricio et al.  showed in his series no more than   Authors’ contributions
           100 mL of blood collected after external drainage   Conceived and designed the study, wrote and
           of the muscular tunnel in 3 patients that underwent   reviewed the manuscript: J.L.B. De Aquino
           mucosectomy due to cardia cancer. Other series;    Collected and tabulated data, participated in
           however, showed a higher level of bleeding (700-   manuscript writing: M.M. Said
           800 mL) but without hemodynamic instability        Participated in manuscript writing and review: J.G.T.
           nonetheless [8,25] . Aquino et al. [18]  showed - in an   De Camargo
           experimental study in dogs  - absence of active
           bleeding  2  h  after  mucosectomy.  Spontaneous   Financial support and sponsorship
           hemostasis occurs due to anatomic characteristics of   None.
           the vessels that branches in the submucosa [26] .
                                                              Conflicts of interest
           Early results for mucosectomy are very acceptable.   There are no conflicts of interest.
           Only 12% of the patients had intraoperative
           complications  and  in  a  significantly  lower  rate   Patient consent
           compared to transhiatal esophagectomy in the own   The patient consent was obtained.
           author’s experience (69%). Early postoperative
           complications were also lower for mucosectomy      Ethics approval
           compared to transhiatal esophagectomy [19] .       This study was approval by the local Research Ethics
                                                              Committee.
           Long-term follow-up (between 10-15 years) in 42
           patients showed excellent and good results in over   REFERENCES
           80%  [30] . Quality of swallow was lower in a long-
           term follow-up to those patients with a retrosternal   1.   Rezende  JM. História  da cirurgia da acalásia do esôfago e do
           reconstruction of the digestive tract. The constrict   megaesôfago chagásico.  Avaliable from: http://www.jmrezende.com.
           space, development of local fibrosis and angulation of   br/acalasia1.htm. [Last accessed on 20 Nov 2017]
           the stomach may lead to these results. Some authors   2.   Aquino JLB, Said MM, Pereira EVA, Kelmann BV, Oliveira MB.
           opted to resect the manubryum and part of the         Tratamento cirúrgico do megaesôfago recidivado.  Rev Col Brás Cir
                                                                 2007;34:310-13.
           clavicle in order increase this space [13,21] .    3.   Aquino JLB, Said MM, Leandro-Merhi VA, Ramos JP, Ichinohe LH,
                                                                 Machado DGG.  Avaliação da esofagocardioplastia no tratamento
           Regurgitation was a symptom with significant          cirúrgico do megaesôfago não avançado recidivado. ABCD Arq Bras
           incidence after mucosectomy (31%). Gastroduodenal     Cir Dig 2012;25:20-4.
           junction patency was compromised in some of        4.   Aquino JL, Said MM, Pereira DA, Leandro-Merhi VA, Nascimento
           the patients with regurgitation. In others without    PC, Reis  VV. Early and late assessment of esophagocardioplasty in
                                                                 the  surgical  treatment of  advanced recurrent  megaesophagus.  Arq
           demonstrable anatomic obstruction, the symptom        Gastroenterol 2016;53:235-9.
           may occur due to consequences of the vagotomy in   5.   Herbella FA, Aquino JL, Stefani-Nakano S, Artifon EL, Sakai P, Crema
           gastric physiology.                                   E, Andreollo NA, Lopes LR, de Castro Pochini C, Corsi PR, Gagliardi
                                                                 D, Del Grande JC. Treatment of achalasia: lessons learned with Chagas'
           Patients should be closely followed after the         disease. Dis Esophagus 2008;21:461-7.
           operation based on the elevated risk for metaplasia,   6.   Kirschner M. Operacionesenlacavidad torácica. Intervenciones enel
                                                                 carcinoma del esófago. In:  Tratado de técnica operatoria general y
           dysplasia and even carcinoma transformation in the    especial - Parte 2. Barcelona: Editorial Labor; 1944. p. 985-1020.
           esophageal stump [27-29] . Some authors opt for chronic   7.   Parrilla Paricio P, Aguayo Albasini JL, Ponce Marco JL. “Stripping”
           use of proton pump inhibitors after esophagectomy to   esofágico submucoso como técnica de esofagectomíasin toracotomia.
           prevent acid esophagitis in the stump [27] .          Estudoclínico y experimental. Cir Esp 1984;38:546-52.

                          Mini-invasive Surgery ¦ Volume 1 ¦ December 28, 2017                            171
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183