Page 97 - Read Online
P. 97

Thinagaran et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:46  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.53  Page 11 of 18


























                                           Figure 15. Transection of the posterior urethral wall.

























                                              Figure 16. Cysto-prostatectomy specimen.


               transurethral resection of prostate and prostate biopsies to rule out prostate cancer, followed by RARC with
               preservation of prostate capsule, vasa and SVs with the trizonal pelvic plexus remaining intact [15,18] . In a
               prospective randomised controlled trial, no significant difference in functional outcomes was seen between
               this approach and the commoner NS approach above . For the SV sparing technique, the prostatectomy
                                                             [19]
               part of the cysto-prostatectomy is down by retrograde intrafascial dissection sparing the vasa, SVs and once
               again, the trizonal architecture of the pelvic plexus. This technique was undertaken by some of the series
               presented in Table 1, with satisfactory outcomes [18,20] , but more study is required to determine whether this
               technique is superior to the more standard approach.


               RESULTS (SEE Appendix 1, Tables 1 AND 2)
               An EMBASE database search was done with key words of robotic, cystectomy, male and nerve sparing,
               which included journal articles, abstract publications or conference abstracts, available in English or
               translated to English. Previous review articles were also checked as sources of original work not otherwise
               found on initial search. Duplications and publications with no description of post-operative functional
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102