Page 102 - Read Online
P. 102
Page 16 of 18 Thinagaran et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:46 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.53
prostate cancer surgery suggests their use in the field of bladder cancer surgery may warrant further
investigation.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Performed data analysis, interpretation and manuscript write up: Thinagaran JKR
Technical description of operative steps, data acquisition: Dovey Z
Review of manuscript: Maqboul F
Review and substantial contributions to conception and design of study: Dovey Z, Wiklund P
Availability of data and materials
Tables 1 and 2 provide details of the systematic review. Appendix A PRISMA METHODOLOGY. Figures to
illustrate NS technique.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
Dr. Dovey Z is Medical Director and stock owner (with certificate of shares) of Medtech Holdings Ltd.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
REFERENCES
1. GLOBOCAN 2020. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/30-Bladder-fact-sheet.pdf. [Last accessed on 9
Jun 2021].
2. Mossanen M, Gore JL. The burden of bladder cancer care: direct and indirect costs. Curr Opin Urol 2014;24:487-91. DOI PubMed
3. Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Sullivan R, Witjes AJ. Economic burden of bladder cancer across the European Union. Eur Urol
2016;69:438-47. DOI PubMed
4. Richters A, Aben KKH, Kiemeney LALM. The global burden of urinary bladder cancer: an update. World J Urol 2020;38:1895-904.
DOI PubMed PMC
5. Marshall VF, Whitmore WF Jr. A technique for the extension of radical surgery in the treatment of vesical cancer. Cancer 1949;2:424-
8. DOI PubMed
6. Guru KA, Perlmutter AE, Butt ZM, et al. The learning curve for robot-assisted radical cystectomy. JSLS 2009;13:509-14. DOI
PubMed PMC
7. Yuh B, Wilson T, Bochner B, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-
assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2015;67:402-22. DOI PubMed
8. Rai BP, Bondad J, Vasdev N, et al. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2019;4:CD011903. DOI PubMed PMC
9. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982;128:492-7. DOI
PubMed
10. Dovey ZS, Tewari AK. Anatomical robotic prostatectomy: technical factors to achieve superb continence and erectile function. Transl
Androl Urol 2020;9:887-97. DOI PubMed PMC
11. Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Huang MW, et al. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing
during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 2011;108:984-92. DOI PubMed
12. Collins JW, Tyritzis S, Nyberg T, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy.
Eur Urol 2013;64:654-63. DOI PubMed
13. Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Perimenis P. Attempted nerve sparing surgery and age have a significant effect on urinary continence and