Page 102 - Read Online
P. 102

Page 16 of 18         Thinagaran et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:46  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.53

               prostate cancer surgery suggests their use in the field of bladder cancer surgery may warrant further
               investigation.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Performed data analysis, interpretation and manuscript write up: Thinagaran JKR
               Technical description of operative steps, data acquisition: Dovey Z
               Review of manuscript: Maqboul F
               Review and substantial contributions to conception and design of study: Dovey Z, Wiklund P

               Availability of data and materials
               Tables 1 and 2 provide details of the systematic review. Appendix A PRISMA METHODOLOGY. Figures to
               illustrate NS technique.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               Dr. Dovey Z is Medical Director and stock owner (with certificate of shares) of Medtech Holdings Ltd.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2021.

               REFERENCES
               1.       GLOBOCAN 2020. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/30-Bladder-fact-sheet.pdf. [Last accessed on 9
                   Jun 2021].
               2.       Mossanen M, Gore JL. The burden of bladder cancer care: direct and indirect costs. Curr Opin Urol 2014;24:487-91.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Sullivan R, Witjes AJ. Economic burden of bladder cancer across the European Union. Eur Urol
                   2016;69:438-47.  DOI  PubMed
               4.       Richters A, Aben KKH, Kiemeney LALM. The global burden of urinary bladder cancer: an update. World J Urol 2020;38:1895-904.
                   DOI  PubMed  PMC
               5.       Marshall VF, Whitmore WF Jr. A technique for the extension of radical surgery in the treatment of vesical cancer. Cancer 1949;2:424-
                   8.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Guru KA, Perlmutter AE, Butt ZM, et al. The learning curve for robot-assisted radical cystectomy. JSLS 2009;13:509-14.  DOI
                   PubMed  PMC
               7.       Yuh B, Wilson T, Bochner B, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-
                   assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2015;67:402-22.  DOI  PubMed
               8.       Rai BP, Bondad J, Vasdev N, et al. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
                   2019;4:CD011903.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               9.       Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982;128:492-7.  DOI
                   PubMed
               10.      Dovey ZS, Tewari AK. Anatomical robotic prostatectomy: technical factors to achieve superb continence and erectile function. Transl
                   Androl Urol 2020;9:887-97.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               11.      Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Huang MW, et al. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing
                   during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 2011;108:984-92.  DOI  PubMed
               12.      Collins JW, Tyritzis S, Nyberg T, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy.
                   Eur Urol 2013;64:654-63.  DOI  PubMed
               13.      Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Perimenis P. Attempted nerve sparing surgery and age have a significant effect on urinary continence and
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107