Page 73 - Read Online
P. 73

Page 8 of 9                                 Gharagozloo et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:22  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.61


               Study limitations
               The following limitations of this study should be considered before drawing definitive conclusions. The
               study was limited to a small number of patients. In addition, the study was retrospective and represented a
               highly selected group of patients.

               Undoubtedly, the use of robotic technology adds greater cost. If the results of this study are validated by
               a randomized prospective study, this shortcoming may be offset by the greater accuracy of dissection, the
               high rates of relief of dysphagia, and the low incidence of pathologic reflux associated with robotic lateral
               Heller myotomy without fundoplication for achalasia.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Collection of data, planning and preparation of manuscript: Gharagozloo F, Atituzzman N, Atiquzzman B

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.

               REFERENCES
               1.   Wood MG, Hagen JA. Primary esophgeal motor disorders. In: Pearson FG, editor. Esophageal surgery. 2nd. Elsevier Science; 2002. pp.
                   515-35.
               2.   Csendes A, Smok G, Braghetto I, Ramirez C, Velasco N, et al. Gastroesophageal sphincter pressure and histological changes in distal
                   esophagus in patients with achalasia of the esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 1985;30:941-5.
               3.   Goldblum JR, Rice TW, Richter JE. Histopathologic features in esophagomyotomy specimens from patients with achalasia.
                   Gastroenterology 1996;111:648-54.
               4.   Ellis FH Jr, Crozier RE, Watkins E. The operation foe esophageal achalasia: results of esophagomyotomy without an antireflux
                   operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;88:344-51.
               5.   Patti MG, Arcerito M, De Pinto M, Feo CV, Tong J, et al. Comparison of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia.
                   J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:561-6.
               6.   Youssef Y, Richards WO, Sharp K, Holzman M, Sekhar N, et al. Relief of dysphagia after laparoscopic Heller myotomy improves long-
                   term quality of life. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:309-13.
               7.   Fisichella PM, Jalilvand A, Lebenthal A. Diagnostic evaluation of achalasia: from the whalebone to the Chicago classification. World J
                   Surg 2015;39:1593-7.
               8.   Marwedel G. Die aufklappung des rippenbogens zur erleichterung operativer eingriffe in hypochondrum und im zwerchfellkuppelraum.
                   Zentralbl Chir 1903;30:938.
               9.   Okike N, Payne SW, Neufeld DM. Esophagomyotomy versus forceful dilation for achalasia of the esophagus: results in 899 patients.
                   Ann Thorac Surg 1079;28:119-25.
               10.  Donahue PE, Samelson S, Schlesinger PK, Bombeck CT, Nyhus LM. Achalasia of the esophagus. Treatment controversies and the
                   method of choice. Ann Surg 1986;203:505-11.
               11.  Campos GM, Vittinghoff E, Rabl C, Takata M, Gadenstätter M, et al. Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78