Page 23 - Read Online
P. 23

Nishimura et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:11                  Mini-invasive Surgery
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2019.48




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Robotic lobectomy costs and quality of life


               Jennifer M. Nishimura, Matthew Goodwin, Peter Kneuertz, Susan Moffatt-Bruce, Robert E. Merritt,
               Desmond M. D’Souza
               Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210,
               USA.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Desmond M. D’Souza, Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center,
               N835 Doan Hall, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. E-mail: desmond.d’souza@osumc.edu

               How to cite this article: Nishimura JM, Goodwin M, Kneuertz P, Moffatt-Bruce S, Merritt RE, D’Souza DM. Robotic lobectomy
               costs and quality of life. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:11. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.48

               Received: 31 Oct 2019    First Decision: 2 Jan 2020    Revised: 13 Jan 2020    Accepted: 3 Feb 2020    Published: 14 Feb 2020
               Science Editor: Valérie Lacroix    Copy Editor: Jing-Wen Zhang    Production Editor: Jing Yu



               Abstract

               The surgical approach for lobectomy has changed over time with recent data demonstrating that the majority are
               performed using a minimally invasive approach. While the use of the robotic platform for pulmonary resection has
               been shown to have acceptable clinical outcomes, cost and quality of life need to be considered when starting a
               robotic lobectomy program. In this review, we evaluate the literature on cost of robotic lobectomy and quality of life.
               The results suggest that early experience in a robotic lobectomy program may be associated with relatively higher
               index hospital costs when compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; however, with increased experience
               and volume, the difference may no longer be of significance. When compared with thoracotomy, the cost is
               comparable if not less costly and may even be profitable for the hospital. Quality of life appears to be acceptable in
               the early experience of robotic lobectomy.

               Keywords: Robotic, thoracic surgery, lobectomy, cost, quality of life, patient reported outcomes




               INTRODUCTION
               The surgical approach for pulmonary lobectomy has significantly changed over time. Two decades ago,
               the majority of lobectomies were performed via thoracotomy. Over time, surgeons began to adopt video-
               assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and an increased proportion of lobectomies were performed
               using this minimally invasive approach. The da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical; Sunnyvale,
               California, USA) later provided an alternative platform. The proportion of lobectomies after introduction


                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                     www.misjournal.net
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28