Page 19 - Read Online
P. 19

Ricciardi et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:1  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.50                                       Page 5 of 8


               Table 2. Mid- and Long-term outcomes of NSCLC treated by Robotic approach
                                Number of  Type of       Follow-up Survival time   Overall survival
               Ref.         Year               Intervention                                          DFS
                                patients  study          (months) analysis  pStage I pStage II pStage III pStage IV
               Toosi et al. [6]  2016  249  Retrospective  Lobectomy  18  3-year  75%  73%  44%  0%  /
                                       single centre
               Veronesi et al. [14]  2018  210  Retrospective Lobectomy  18  3-year  /  /  61.2%  /  37.7%
                                       multicentre
               Yang et al. [14]  2017  172  Prospective  Lobectomy  39.8  5-year  77.6%  /  /  /   72.7%
                                       single centre
               Lee et al. [8]  2015  53  Retrospective Lobectomy  13.3  2-year  95%           /    93%
                                       single centre
               Park et al. [13]  2011  325  Retrospective Lobectomy  27  3-year  97% (IA), 72%  43%  /  90%
                                       multicentre                     88% (IB)
               Gharagozloo et al. [9]  2008  54  Retrospective Lobectomy  28  2-year  100%  100%  /  /  93%
                                       single centre
               Cheufou et al. [10]  2018  64  Retrospective Lobectomy  /  2-year  83%         /    /
                                       single centre
               Cerfolio et al. [15]  2018  1321  Retrospective Lobectomy  30  5-year  83% (IA), 68% (IIA), 62% (IIIA),   54%  Mean DFS:
                                       multicentre                     77% (IB) 70% (IIB) 31% (IIIB)  16 months
               Casiraghi et al. [11]  2019  307  Retrospective Lobectomy  28.8  5-year  89.1%  /   72.8%
                                       single centre
               Zirafa et al. [12]  2019  212  Retrospective 211 Lobectomy  40.3  5-year  98.5%  93.7%  73.1%  0%  Mean DFS:
                                       single centre 1 Bilobectomy                                 66.3 months
                DFS: disease free survival; NSCLC: non-small-cell lung cancer


               recurrence rate was 10% (32/325). Most recurrences (72%) were distant (17 distant only; 6 locoregional +
                                                       [13]
               distant), and 28% (9/32) were locoregional only .

                                                                                [14]
               The retrospective multicentre (seven centres) study led by Veronesi et al.  analysed 223 patients with
               NSCLC or carcinoid, with pathological (post-surgical) N2 disease (Stage IIIA) treated by robot assisted
               resection with curative intent, before or after chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy. The study included
               34 patients who underwent resection after induction therapies. With a mean follow-up of 18 months, mean
               survival for the 210 NSCLC patients (13 carcinoids) was 51 months, with three-year OS estimated at 61.2%.
               Twenty-five per cent of patients (56 cases) had distant relapse and 16.6% had local or lung recurrence.


                           [15]
               Cerfolio et al.  reported the largest series of robotic lobectomy for NSCLC in four high volume centres. The
               authors analysed short- and long-term outcomes of 1339 and 1321 patients, respectively. Approximately 50%
               of patients had stage IA disease (672/1339). With a mean follow-up of 30 months (ranging between 1 and 154
               months), the five-year stage-specific survival was: 83% for stage IA, 77% for stage IB, 68% for stage IIA, 70%
               for IIB, 62% for stage IIIA and 31% for stage IIIB. The recurrence rate was 15% (distant) and 3% (local).


               CONCLUSIONS
               Robotic approach for lobectomy is one of the newest evolutions in MIS for NSCLC; however, long-term
               data on its oncologic efficacy are still limited. For this purpose, in this review, we have analysed ten studies,
               both monocentric and multicentric, to examine oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent robotic
               lobectomy.

               Concerning short-term results, the robotic surgery has shown several promising results such as conversion
               rates to thoracotomy, transfusions rate, length of stay and readmission rates compared with VATS. A
                                                            [5]
               propensity-matched analysis conducted by Oh et al.  comparing open lobectomy and robotic lobectomy
               showed a lower postoperative complication rate, lower mortality rate and shorter hospital stay in the
               robotic cohort.

               The conversion rate exposed in the present review ranges between 0% and 9.8%, comparable to that
               reported in the literature and lower than that of VATS [16-18] . Only one study reported a higher conversion
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24