Page 25 - Read Online
P. 25

Nishimura et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:11  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.48                                   Page 3 of 10


                    Country  USA  USA  China  USA  USA  USA  Canada  Italy  France  China  USA  USA  USA  USA  USA  USA



                    Institution/Database  Database (NIS)  OSU (three surgeons)  Shanghai Chest Hospital  MD Anderson (two   surgeons)  Database (HCUP Florida   SID)  University of Michigan  St. Joseph’s Healthcare   Hamilton (two   surgeons)  (single surgeon)  Rouen University  First Affiliated Hospital   of Zheijiang University  Swedish  UAB (single surgeon)  Database (NIS)  Cape Cod Hospital   (single surgeon)  Database (premier)  MSKCC








                    Technique  -  4 arms   3 arms  Total portal   technique  -  3 arms  4 arms  -  4 arms  3 arms   4 arms  3 arms  4 arms  -  4 arms  -  3 arms




                    Model  -  Si Xi   (2016)  S  Si Xi  -  Si  Si  -  Si  -  Si  Si  -  Si  -  Si


                    Comparison groups  VATS  VATS open  VATS  VATS open  VATS open  VATS  VATS  VATS open  VATS  VATS  VATS open  None  VATS  VATS  VATS  VATS open







                    OR time (min)  -  287.2 (mean)  90.8 (average)  226 (median)  -  231  324 (mean) ‡  150 (median) ‡  255 (median) ‡  136 (mean) ‡  223 ‡  107 (median) ‡  -  261  255 (median)  217 ‡ Value includes robotic surgical resection other than lobectomy. *Number includes robotic lobectomy, segmentectomy, and/or non-anatomic resections. **Number includes robotic lobectomy,  segmentectomy, and conversions to open. OR: operating room; n: number of robotic lobectomi





                    Early experience  No (first robotic   assisted surgery in   Yes (first 25 robotic   lobectomies)  Yes (first year of   robotic thoracic   oncology)  No (robotic   lobectomy since   Yes (but excluded   first 30 robotic   Yes (first year)





                      -   No      2009)  No   -      No      2012)  cases)  -   No  -  -  -
                      Retrospective   Retrospective   Retrospective   Retrospective   Retrospective  Retrospective  Retrospective  Retrospective  observational  Retrospective   Retrospective  Retrospective  Retrospective  Retrospective   Retrospective   Retrospective

                    Type  PSM  PSM-IPTW  PSM  PSM-IPTW   Prospective   PSM       case-control  PSM




                    n                           40 (42)*  21 (23)*  39 (57)*  64 (71)*  50 (57)*  (394)**  (620)*
                      1434  296  230  106  1929  25                      282   2498  22  295   12
                 Table 1. Summary of robotic lobectomy cost studies
                    Study period  2010-2013  Jan 2012-Sep   2017  May 2013-Apr   2016  2011-2017  2008-2014  Nov 2010-Mar   2012  Apr 2014-Mar   2015  May 2015-Mar   2016  Sep 2014-Sep   2015  Sep 2014-Jul   2015  2008-2012  Feb 2010-Oct   2013  2008-2011  Jun 2011-Dec   2012  2009-2011  2007 Database; PSM: propensity score matching; IPTW: inverse probability of treatment weighting




                    Published  2019  2019  2019  2019  2019  2019  2018  2018  2017  2016  2014  2014  2014  2014  2014  2008







                    First author  Glenn et al. [8]  Kneuertz et al. [17]  Li et al. [19]  Nelson et al. [16]  Subramanian et al. [1]  Worrell et al. [21]  Kaur et al. [11]  Novellis et al. [14]  Gondé et al. [7]    Bao et al. [18]  Deen et al. [15]  Nasir  et al. [13]  Paul et al. [10]  Spillane et al. [20]  Swanson et al. [9]  Parket al. [4]
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30