Page 31 - Read Online
P. 31
Kumar et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2018;2:19 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2018.26 Page 9 of 15
OS (%) NR NR NR 94.7 (3 years) NR NR NR NR NR NR
Recurrence (%) 27.3 (OR), 5.8 (LR) 11.2(LR) NR 26.3 (OR) 5.5 (OR) NR 14.3 NR NR 30/31.2 (OR), 6.0/11.4 (LR)
Median follow-up (months) 24 38 (6-81) NR NR 23.6 (11.9-41.4) NR 14 NR NR 26.3
Median positive LN, n (%) 2.2 (71) 9 (56.2) 7 7 (15.2) 28 3(38) 0 20 16.5 28.0/41.2
Median LN yield (n) 6 (2-14) 9.1 (3-19) 23 19.5 (3-43) 17 (7-27) 4.1 (1-13) 7 (2-23) 19 (5-47) 19 (5-62) 6.6 (0-25)/ 6.4 (1-14)
Hospital stay (days) 9 (7-35) 9.9 (7-14) 11 22.9 (9-64) 25.5 (9-56) 7.5 (5-12) 10 (5-24) 8 (6-13) 8 (6-15) NA
Overall morbidity (%) 20.6 31.2 7.4 43.47 16.7 25 29 14 30.6 4/20 NACT/RT: neo-adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy; LN: lymph node; OR: overall recurrence; LR: local recurrence; OS: overall survival; LL: laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection; RL: robotic One of the initial reports on laparoscopic multi visceral resection comes from Bretagnol et al. [21] . In this study, there were 12 locally advanced rectal cancers with adjac
Table 2. Case series of laparoscopic/robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection and outcomes
Conversion to open (%) 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Median blood loss, mL (range) 44 (20-240) for UL 188 (50-370) 150 252 (25-1267) 380 (10-930) 48 (20-100) 200 (50-700) 27 (5-690) 25 (0-690) 34.6/50.6 for UL
Median operative time, min (range) 58 (42-94) for UL 310 (220-510) 271 641 (356-984) 603.7 (473-746) 38 (20-51) for UL 396 (170-581) 476 (320-68) 455 (249-683) 41.0/35.3 for UL
NACT/RT (%) 100 56 NR 52.2 0 100 86 12 11.8 NR lateral pelvic lymph node dissection; UL: unilateral; NA: not available; NR: not reported
Number of patients (n) 34 (LL) 16 (14 LL, 2 RL) 68 (LL) 46 (LL) 18 (LL) 8 (RL) 21 (11 RL, 10 LL) 50 (RL) 85 (RL) 85 (50 RL, 35 LL)
Year 2011 2011 2011 2016 2015 2012 2014 2015 2016 2018 carefully selected patients.
Study Liang [58] Park et al. [59] Liu et al. [60] Nagayoshi et al. [62] Furuhata et al. [65] Park et al. [66] Bae et al. [67] Kagawa et al. [68] Yamaguchi et al. [69] Kim et al. [70]
