Page 33 - Read Online
P. 33

Kumar et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2018;2:19  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2018.26                                       Page 11 of 15

                                                                        Pubic symphysis




                                                             Vas deferens


                                                                            Bladder

                                                 Left ureter


                                                                   Rectum

                          Figure 9. Laparoscopic extended resection showing distal ureter where it arches below the vas deferens

               resection in three patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. After abdominal part of laparoscopic surgery,
               sacral resection (below S3/S4) was performed in prone position. Laparoscopic abdominosacral resection
               provides short-term benefits of MIS approach with negative circumferential margin [76,77] . Uemura et al.
                                                                                                        [78]
               recently reported a complete laparoscopic abdominosacral resection using a Gigli wire saw for a locally
               recurrent rectal cancer. The distance between the estimated line of resection (below the S4 vertebra) and
               sacral promontory was measured by preoperative imaging. Intraoperatively, line of resection was marked and
               Gigli wire was passed dorsal to sacral bone at the level of resection. Both the ends of wire were brought out
               through lower abdominal ports and sacrum was cut by the linear reciprocating motion of the Gigli wire saw.


               This review has several limitations. There were no randomized controlled trials or prospective studies
               available in the current literature in context to this review. There was heterogeneity between the studies with
               small sample size. There were no studies with long-term follow-up to evaluate oncological outcomes. Short-
               term outcomes were variable due to patient selection bias and heterogeneity in the available studies.


               CONCLUSIONS
               The technological advances in instrumentation, advances in surgical techniques, increased surgeon
               experience made MIS feasible with good perioperative outcomes in b-TME/e-TME in carefully selected
               patients. Laparoscopic surgery has considerable learning curve and should be performed by experienced
               surgical teams. Robotic surgery is feasible and beneficial in complex resection in pelvis. However, evidence
               for long-term oncological outcomes of MIS in b-TME/e-TME is low and needs to be studied further by
               randomized controlled trial once enough numbers are possible in institutes with high volume rate.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Concepts and definition of intellectual content: Kumar NAN, Saklani A
               Literature search: Kumar NAN, Kammar P
               Design, manuscript preparation, editing, and review: Kumar NAN, Kammar P, Saklani A

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38