Page 63 - Read Online
P. 63
Page 8 of 11 Riachi et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:14 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2022.120
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, through the development of more efficient and advanced technology, RPD continues to
surmount the technical challenges that previously limited the progression of minimally invasive pancreatic
surgery. Active prospective randomized control trials will help elucidate the relationship between RPD and
surgical outcomes. Continued development and implementation of educational curricula for residency and
fellowship training programs is critical to the expansion and improvement of robotic surgery. Finally,
advancements in AI offer innovative solutions to reduce errors and improve outcomes.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Design, literature research and review, critical review of the manuscript, final approval: Riachi ME, Hewitt
DB
Drafted the manuscript: Riachi ME
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.
REFERENCES
1. Puckett Y, Garfield K. Pancreatic cancer. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. PubMed
2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022;72:7-33. DOI PubMed
3. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the
unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014;74:2913-21. DOI PubMed
4. Brown ZJ, Cloyd JM. Trends in the utilization of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol
2021;123:1432-40. DOI PubMed
5. Halsted WS. Contributions to the surgery of the bile passages, especially of the common bile-duct. Boston Med Surg J 1899;141:645-
54. DOI
6. Whipple AO. Observations on radical surgery for lesions of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1946;82:623-31. PubMed
7. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 2006;244:10-5. DOI
PubMed PMC
8. Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:530-6. DOI PubMed
9. Simon R. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2021;101:865-74. DOI PubMed
10. Kang CM, Lee JH. Pathophysiology after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:5794-804. DOI PubMed PMC
11. Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 1994;8:408-10. DOI PubMed
12. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg
2003;138:777-84. DOI
13. Robinson TN, Stiegmann GV. Minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopy 2004;36:48-51. DOI