Page 61 - Read Online

Page 6 of 11 Riachi et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:14 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2022.120

Table 2. Studies comparing RPD to Open PD
EBL RPD OR time R0RR POPF CS-POPF Morb. CDS ≥ Mort. LOS
N LN RPD
RPD vs. OPD RPD vs. vs. OPD RPD vs. RPD vs. RPD vs. RPD vs. III RPD RPD vs. RPD vs.
Author (mean OPD (mean OPD OPD OPD (%) OPD vs. OPD OPD OPD
vs. N (mean) (
OPD in ml) (P in minutes) P-value) (%) (P- (%) (P- (P- (%) (P- (%) (P- (%) (P- (days) (
-value) (P-value) value) value) value) value) value) value) P-value)
[57]
Zhou et al. 8 vs. 8 153 vs. 718 vs. 420 NR 87.5 vs. 50 vs. 0 vs. 12.5 25 vs. 75 NR 0 vs. 12.5 16.4 vs.
210 (P = 0.011) 100 37.5 (NR) (P = (P = 24.3
(P = (P = (P = 0.05) 0.05) (P =
0.045) 0.05) 0.05) 0.04)
Buchs et al. [58] 44 vs. 387 vs. 444 vs. 559 16.8 vs. 11 90.9 vs. 18 vs. 50 vs. 37.5 36.4 vs. NR 4.5 vs. 13 vs. 14.6
39 827 (P < 0.01) (P = 0.02) 81.5 20.5 (NR) 48.7 2.6
(P < 0.01) (P = (P = (0.27) (P = (P = 0.4)
0.45) 1.00) 1.00)
Chalikonda 30 vs. 485 vs. 476 vs. 366.4 NR 0 vs. 13 6.7 vs. 6.7 vs. 16.7 30 vs. 44 NR 1 vs. 0 9.8 vs.
[64]
et al. 30 775 (P = 16.7 (NR) (NR) (P = 0.14) (P = 13.3
(P = 0.13) (P < 0.01) 0.02) 0.09) (P =
0.043)
[59]
Lai et al. 20 vs. 247 vs. 492 vs. 265 10 vs. 10 73.3 vs. 35 vs. NR 50 vs. NR 0 vs. 3 13.7 vs.
67 775 (P = 0.01) (P = 0.99) 64.1 17.9 49.3 (P = 25.8
(P = (P = (P = 0.11) (P = 0.43)
0.03) 0.92) 0.95)
[65] * * **
Chen et al. 60 vs. 400 vs. 410 vs. 323 13.6 vs. 94.7 vs. 13.3 vs. 8.3 vs. 15.0 35 vs. 40 11.7 vs. 1.7 vs. 2.5 20 vs. 25
120 500 (P < 0.01) 12.5 92.1 24.2 (NR) (P = 13.3 (P < 0.01)
(P < 0.01) (P = (P = (P = 0.515) (P = (P =
0.350) 1.00) 0.09) 0.752) 1.00)
[54]
Zureikat et al. 211 vs. 200 vs. 402 vs. 300 27.5 vs. 19 R1RR: 50 NR 13.74 vs. NR 23.7 vs. 1.9 vs. 8 vs. 8
817 300 (P < 0.01) (P < 0.01) vs. 31 9.04 23.9 2.89 (P =
(P < 0.01) (P < (P = 0.04) (P = (P = 0.98)
***
0.01) 0.96) 0.46)
Boggi et al. [49] 83 vs. NR 527 vs. 425 37 vs. 36 87.5 vs. 33.8 vs. 18.1 vs. 5.6 73.5 vs. 18.1 vs. 2.4 vs. 0 17 vs. 14
36 (P < 0.01) (P = 0.51) 54.5 16.7 (NR) 77.9 11.2 (NR) (P = (P =
(P = (P = (P = 1.00) 0.06)
0.08) 0.06) 0.62)
Wang et al. [63] 87 vs. 202 vs. 455 vs. 375 15 vs. 13 96.6 vs. NR 8 vs. 12.6 43.7 vs. 9.1 vs. 8.0 0 vs. 0 24 vs. 24
87^ 298 (P < 0.01) (P < 0.01) 94.3 (P = 53.2 (NR) (P =
(P < 0.01) (P = 0.456) (P 0.884)
0.363) =0.612)
Varley et al. [66] 133 vs. 200 vs. 393 vs. 432 NR 82% vs. 12 vs. 24 5 vs. 18 NR 24 vs. 28 3.8 vs. 8 vs. 10
149 500 (P < 0.01) 81% (P = (P < 0.01) (P = 5.4 (P < 0.01)
(P < 0.01) (P = 0.013) 0.464) (P =
0.851) 0.52)
[67]
Girgis et al. 163 vs. 250 vs. 402 vs. 421 31.9 vs. 82.5 vs. NR NR NR 24.5 vs. 4.29 vs. 7 vs. 9
198 500 (P = 0.081) 25.9 82.3 29.8 4.55 (P < 0.01)
(P < 0.01) (P < 0.01) (P = (P = (P =
0/055) 0.265) 0.908)
[62]
Jin et al. 22 vs. 75 vs. 225 vs. 275 3.5 vs. 1 100 vs. 68.2 vs. 9.1 vs. 18.2 NR 9 vs. 4.5 NR 15 vs. 19
22^ 300 (P = 0.294) (P = 100 (NR) 68.2 (P = (P = (P =
(P < 0.01) 0.205) (NR) 0.0664) 1.00) 0.493)
Mejia et al. [68] 102 vs. 321 vs. 353 vs. 212 24.2 vs. 66.7 vs. 4 vs. 0 4 vs. 0 14.7 vs. 9.3 vs. 3 vs. 2 7 vs. 11.8
54 378 (P < 0.01) 23.7 70 (NR) (NR) 37.0 (NR) 5.9 (NR) (NR) (P < 0.01)
(P = (P = 780) (P =
0.121) 0.663)
[61]
Shi et al. 187 vs. 297 vs. 279 vs. 298 16.6 vs. 94.7 vs. NR 10.2 vs. NR NR 2.1 vs. 3.7 22.4 vs.
187^ 415 (P = 0.02) 15.8 93 14.4 26.1
(P < 0.01) (P = (P -0.68) (P = 0.09) (P = (P =
0.495) 0.47) 0.03)
[70]
Nassour et al. 626 vs. NR NR 22 vs. 17 77 vs. 78 NR NR NR NR 4 vs. 6 10 vs. 11
17,205 (P < 0.01) (NR) (P = (P < 0.01)
0.061)
Nassour et al. [69] 155 vs. NR NR 30 vs. 18 79 vs. 84 NR NR NR NR 3.4 vs. 8 vs. 10
3,329 (P < 0.01) (NR) 2.6 (P < 0.01)
(P =
0.570)
[60]
Shyr et al. 304 vs. 197 vs. 468 vs. 438 18 vs. 18 NR NR 13 vs. 11.2 48.2 vs. 12.3 vs. 2.1 vs. 1.8 20 vs. 24
172 531 (P = 0.015) (P = (P = 56.8 8.3 (NR) (P = (P =