Page 43 - Read Online
P. 43

Qu et al. J Transl Genet Genom 2023;7:3-16  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2022.16  Page 13

               motifs similar to known binding motifs for transcription factors involved in promoting immune processes
               (IRF, ELF3).

               Role of dietary fat as a tumor promoter
               Two specific cancer-promoting pathways were found to be transcriptionally upregulated after three days of
               HFD. Genes, predominantly ligands and receptors organizing the extracellular matrix, involved in PI3K-
               Akt signaling were identified to be significantly upregulated in the small intestinal epithelia of WT mice fed
               HFD compared to those from WT mice fed LFD. In addition, genes coding for glutathione transferases
               were identified to be significantly upregulated inApc Min/+  HFD compared toApc Min/+  LFD samples. These
               changes are associated with both tumor progression and resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and serve to
               mitigate the oxidative stress associated with elevated tumor metabolic rates [27,28] . Despite these changes, the
               major tumorigenic pathways, including Wnt, Jak-STAT, MAPK, and mTOR, remained stable after three
               days of HFD feeding.


               While dietary fat is not a tumor initiator since it is not mutagenic, its association with tumor growth
               suggests its role as a tumor promoter. Given the widespread H3K27ac changes induced by HFD, these
               results suggest a significant role for epigenetic effects in mediating the acceleration of tumor growth.
               However, a mutation in one or more key cancer driver genes may be required before supportive metabolic
               changes promote tumor growth. These observations agree with previous demonstrations that high-fat diets
               accelerate tumor growth in genetically predisposed tissues, i.e., with mutated oncogene or tumor-
               suppressed genes [40,41] .

               Temporal impact of HFD on the epigenome and transcriptome
               When comparing this study with previous studies that fed mice HFD for 15-20 weeks, we identified
               differing results between the studies that suggest a temporal evolution of the epigenome and transcriptome
               based on the duration of HFD exposure. Li et al. showed that 15-20 weeks of HFD resulted in gained VELs
               associated with regulation of MAP kinase activity and JAK-STAT cascade, but these prominent cancer
                                                                                                 [5]
               pathways were not enriched among gained VELs resulting from three days of HFD in our study . Li et al.
               also found lost VELs associated with antigen presentation and processing after 15-20 weeks of HFD,
               whereas our study did not show these changes after three days of HFD . An earlier study found
                                                                                  [5]
               transcriptional downregulation of negative regulators of several pathways involving the EGFR/RTK-RAS-
               ERK/MAPK cascade, TFG-β signaling, and JAK-STAT signaling; however, these negative regulators were
                                                              [6]
               not downregulated after three days of HFD in our study . Overall, these time-dependent differences suggest
               a temporal progression of intestinal epigenomic and transcriptomic changes resembling cancer progression
               dependent on the duration of HFD exposure.


               Impact of Apc min heterozygosity on epigenomic and transcriptomic changes
               Our study showed that diet type had a much more significant impact on epigenomic and transcriptomic
               variations than the Apc Min genotype. Most of the significant processes and pathways identified from
               analyzing the VELs and DEGs induced by HFD were the same between each genotype. Some VELs and
               DEGs were identified only when comparing WT HFD and WT LFD, and some were identified only when
               comparingApc Min/+  HFD versusApc Min/+  LFD. However, these differences were not significant enough to be
               identified when directly comparing WT LFD toApc Min/+  LFD samples or WT HFD toApc Min/+  HFD samples.
               The relatively small differences between the two genotypes suggest that the Wnt signaling pathway is still
               well-regulated inApc Min/+  mice relative to WT mice after three days of HFD.
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48