Page 66 - Read Online
P. 66

Tang et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 38  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2025.05  Page 7 of 19
































                Figure 3. The distribution of pairwise distances between datapoints in the space of features (scaled on unit cube). Solid curves are for
                alloys of: blue - Nb, red - Nb -Nb Si , green - Nb -Nb Si , black - Si -Nb Si , magenta - Si -Nb Si . Black circles are for the combined
                                                      3
                                                             I
                                                    5
                                        3
                                                 II
                                                                  3
                                                                            II
                                                                5
                                                                               5
                                                                                 3
                                      5
                                   I
                dataset. The curves were scaled by 1/3 for Nb -Nb Si  and by 1/6 for the combined set for better readability.
                                                   3
                                                 5
                                              II
















                Figure 4. The distribution of substitution energies (in eV/cell) in different datasets. Solid curves are for alloys of: blue - Nb, red -
                Nb -Nb Si , green - Nb -Nb Si , black - Si -Nb Si , magenta - Si -Nb Si . Black circles are for the combined dataset.
                  I  5  3     II  5  3    I  5  3        II  5  3

               influence the model’s ability to generalize to unseen data. In SVR, gamma g is the inverse of twice the
               squared length parameter (σ) of the RBF kernel. The value of gamma determines the reach of a single
               training example: a low gamma value suggests a far-reaching influence, leading to a smoother, more
               generalized model, whereas a high gamma value implies a more localized influence that is more sensitive to
               the data and potentially more complex. The results of this optimization are detailed in Table 1.
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71