Page 70 - Read Online
P. 70

Page 8 of 15                           Gao et al. J Mater Inf 2023;3:6  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2023.03































                Figure 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between characteristic variables and alloy properties. EL: elongation; UTS: ultimate tensile
                strength; YS: yield strength.

















                            2
                  Figure 4. (A) R  score and (B) MAE value of different models on 90% training set and 10% testing set. MAE: mean absolute error.















                Figure 5. Performance of the MLPReg model predicted (A)UTS; (B)YS; and (C)EL on the training set and the testing set. EL: elongation;
                UTS: ultimate tensile strength; YS: yield strength.


               dropped dramatically with the increased size due to the overfitting. Moreover, compared with the RFReg
               model, the MLPReg has a higher score overall. Therefore, the MLPReg model was selected as the optimal
               model to construct the quantitative relation of “composition-process-properties” in SLMed Al-Si-(Mg)
               alloy.
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75