Page 53 - Read Online
P. 53

Liu et al. J Mater Inf 2022;2:20  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2022.29        Page 5 of 12













































                Figure 1. Machine-learned temperature, T  vs. actual temperature, T. (A): Cu atoms; (B): Zr atoms; (C): Ni atoms; (D): Ti atoms; (E):
                                            ML
                Pd atoms; (F): total atoms. ML: Machine learning.
               As illustrated in Figure 2A, a tensile test was first simulated at T = 100 K to measure the σ , which was
                                                                                              max
               usually defined as yielding in a simulation . Subsequently, three creep stresses lower than σ  were chosen,
                                                  [38]
                                                                                             max
               i.e., σ  = 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 GPa. The creep curves on the holding stage are plotted in Figure 2B. The transient
                    h
               and steady-state creep stage can be observed on all curves, whereas the tertiary stage with the rapid increase
               in strain rate only occurs on the curve of σ  = 2.4 GPa within the time window. During the stress holds, local
                                                   h
               irreversible atomic rearrangements are continually activated and lead to the macroscopic viscoplastic flow.
               According to Zhang et al., the activation volume can be fitted from the relation of the applied stress σ and
               steady-state  strain  rate      ,  as  expressed  by  Ω  =      k T∂ln  /∂σ,  where  k   is  Boltzmann  constant .  The
                                                                                                   [22]
                                                             B
                                                                              B
                                                                                      3
               activation volume of the HEMG is 27 nm  smaller than that of Cu Zr  MG (31 nm  fitted from the curves
                                                   3
                                                                       50
                                                                           50
                                                               [22]
                      [34]
               in  Ref.  ),  consistent  with  the  experimental  results . Note  that  the  smaller  activation  volume  of
               the HEMG may be due to its smaller molar volume, if we assume that the HEMG sample has the same
               atomic packing density as the Cu Zr .
                                              50
                                           50
               To reveal the stress-induced heterogeneity in atomic dynamics, we applied the kNN model to predict T ML
               for every atom. The histograms in Figure 2C statistically display the distributions of T . If there is no
                                                                                            ML
               applied stress on the HEMG sample, the T  will have a Gaussian distribution, which means that the atomic
                                                   ML
               motion is activated by thermal agitations and corresponds to only one characteristic temperature. In
               Figure 2C, there is a maximum at T  = ~300 K. It is reasonable to find the peak at T = 300 K rather than
                                              ML
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58