Page 82 - Read Online
P. 82

Page 14 of 18             Monaco et al. J Environ Expo Assess 2024;3:18  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jeea.2024.10

               From a translational perspective, it is interesting to note that the effects of DEHP on the microbiota were
               more apparent in the AC contents compared to the RC contents, the latter of which is reflective of a fecal
               sample in humans. A higher number of phyla that differed in AC vs. RC (5 vs. 0) were observed between
               CON and DEHP200. Additionally, 6 and 13 bacterial genera differed between CON and DEHP20, and
               between CON and EDHP200, respectively, in AC, while only 1 and 4 differential genera were observed in
               RC between CON and DEHP20, and between CON and DEHP200, respectively. In this study, bacterial
               genera in the phyla Firmicutes were more affected by DEHP than those in the phylum Bacteroidota in
               samples  from  both  the  AC  and  RC.  However,  within  the  Bacteroidota,  both  Odoribacter  and
               Sanguibacteroides were affected in AC and RC, whereas Bacteroides were also affected in the AC vs. Alistipes
               in the RC. Within the Bacillota, there were about an equal number of genera with differential abundance in
               response to DEHP. This should be considered when evaluating the impact of DEHP on the microbiome in
               human studies, as microbial dysbiosis in more proximal regions of the gut is likely underappreciated.

               This study revealed for the first time notable alterations in small intestine structure and disaccharidase
               activity, as well as changes in colonic bacteria due to DEHP exposure, in the piglet model. However, several
               limitations warrant consideration. First, the doses administered exceeded typical DEHP exposure levels
               observed in healthy infants and children, although the DEHP20 dose reflected that found in the urine of
                              [72]
               pregnant women . Second, we did not factor in potential secondary phthalate exposure from other dietary
               sources, plastic materials in the feeding system, or uncontrolled environmental factors. However, any
               additional exposure to phthalate contaminants affected all groups equally, minimizing potential
               compounding effects on the outcomes. Third, microbial taxonomy was assessed by 16S rRNA gene
               sequencing, and we did not measure fecal VFAs and other metabolites, which could have provided
               additional insights into the impact of microbiota functional changes. In addition, 16S rRNA gene
               sequencing does not capture the genetic differences that are known to exist in different strains of the same
               bacterium, as observed among the different strains of E. coli, with some being highly pathogenic while
               others are not. A recent study in mice  concluded that DEHP exposure causes an imbalance of intestinal
                                                [56]
               microbial homeostasis, which results in a decrease in beneficial bacteria and an expansion of pathogenic
               bacteria abundance. The analyses of fecal metabolome indicated metabolic profiles were also changed due to
               DEHP and caused intestinal barrier dysfunction and activation of the AhR/NF-κB pathway to induce
               intestinal inflammation. Unfortunately, it is still unclear if the change in the metabolic profile was caused by
               DEHP or by dysbiosis . Future studies could use gnotobiotic animals not directly exposed to DEHP but
                                  [56]
               implanted with microbiota from DEHP-exposed animals. This approach would enable the determination of
               the specific effects of a DEHP-modified microbiota on host health. Future studies should use DEHP infant
               exposure levels and should incorporate metagenomic sequencing and metabolomic analyses to gain broader
               insight into the potential effects of DEHP on microbiome function.


               CONCLUSION
               This study documented that DEPH, a widely recognized endocrine-disrupting chemical, alters both the
               structure and function of the small intestine and induces changes in the colonic microbial community. The
               extent to which these microbiota structural changes contribute to alterations in intestinal development
               requires further study. Herein, we confirmed that the neonatal piglet is a suitable model for investigating
               how phthalate impacts development in early life. Building on previous findings , this study sheds light on
                                                                                  [19]
               the complex effects of phthalates, emphasizing the importance of continued inquiry into their biological
               ramifications. Furthermore, our findings highlight the potential health risks associated with DEHP exposure
               during critical periods of development. Future research should focus on the long-term consequences of
               early-life exposure to DEHP and other phthalates, including potential impacts on growth, immune function,
               and overall health. Additionally, exploring interventions to mitigate these effects could be valuable.
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87