Page 110 - Read Online
P. 110

Devarakonda et al.                                                                                                                                                            Impact of insurance on overall survival

           noted to  be 6.2 years compared to  5.1 years in the   impact of health care insurance on the outcomes of
           African American group (P = 0.517). Likewise, gender   patients  with multiple  myeloma.  Previous  studies
           had little impact on survival as there was only a slight   examined  the  role  of  poverty  and  socioeconomic
           but  not  statistically  significant  increase  in  survival  in   status on the outcome of patients with MM but until
           female patients with MM with a mean survival of 5.4   now  there  was  no  study  looking  into  the  role  of
           years for females vs. 5.1 years for males (P = 0.748).   health care insurance on the survival of patients with
           Follow up of patients with MGUS at 8.3 years revealed   this disease. In our study, we found that the funded
           that 73% of funded patients were alive as compared   patients diagnosed with MM and MGUS, the precursor
           to 50% in the non-funded group (P = 0.03).The overall   of  MM,  have  significantly  better  median,  5-year  and
           survival of patients when classified according to stage   overall survivals than patients without insurance. The
           was 12.8 years for stage 1, 4.3 years for stage 2, 5.1   insurance status was analyzed at the time of diagnosis
           years for stage 3A  and 3.3 years for stage 3B (P  <   and did not take into account change of insurance
           0.0001).  Although the stage distribution was similar   status during the course of the illness. It could be
           in the funded and non-funded  groups at the time of   presumed that funded patients had better access to
           diagnosis, within each stage the funded patients had   medical care, thereby allowing for earlier diagnosis;
           improved  survival.  P-values to compare  the survival   less advanced disease, and hence improved survival.
           difference between funded and non-funded groups for   However,  there  was  no  statistically  significant
           stage 1, 2, 3a, and 3b were 0.098, 0.267, 0.039, and   difference in the distribution of disease stage between
           0.123, respectively.                               the funded and non-funded groups. Another feature
                                                              of MM that could potentially influence the outcomes is
           DISCUSSION                                         the biology of the disease as reflected by the presence
                                                              of disease risk features. However, the Mayo Clinic risk
           We  have  conducted  the  first  study  to  examine  the   stratification criteria were similarly distributed between











































           Figure 1: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients with multiple myeloma or MGUS diagnosed and treated. (A) Overall survival of patients
           with multiple myeloma; (B) comparison of overall survival of multiple myeloma based on race; (C) comparison of overall survival of
           multiple myeloma based on funding; (D) comparison of overall survival of MGUS based on funding. MGUS: monoclonal gammopathy of
           undetermined significance
            102                                                                          Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ¦ Volume 3 ¦ June 9, 2017
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115