Page 63 - Read Online
P. 63

of ruffling activity and filopodial protrusions and by down   RE, Bigner DD, Fontebasso A, Albrecht S, Jabado N, Lindsey JC, Bailey
           regulation of stress-fibers. [82]                     S, Gupta N, Weiss WA, Bognár L, Klekner A, Van Meter TE, Kumabe
                                                                 T, Tominaga T, Elbabaa SK, Leonard JR, Rubin JB, Liau LM, Van Meir
                                                                 EG, Fouladi M, Nakamura H, Cinalli G, Garami M, Hauser P, Saad AG,
           Thus, OBSC is an excellent technology to address a wide   Iolascon A, Jung S, Carlotti CG, Vibhakar R, Ra YS, Robinson S, Zollo
           range of topics in primary brain tumor research, ranging from   M, Faria CC, Chan JA, Levy ML, Sorensen PH, Meyerson M, Pomeroy
           growth- and dissemination-promoting signaling, to the intricate   SL, Cho YJ, Bader GD, Tabori U, Hawkins CE, Bouffet E, Scherer SW,
           interrelations between the tumor and its surrounding host tissue   Rutka JT, Malkin D, Clifford SC, Jones SJ, Korbel JO, Pfister SM, Marra
           to the evaluation of efficaciousness of novel targeting strategies.  MA,  Taylor  MD.  Subgroup-specific  structural  variation  across  1,000
                                                                 medulloblastoma genomes. Nat 2012;488: 49-56.
                                                              3.   Northcott PA, A Korshunov, H Witt H, Hielscher T, Eberhart CG, Mack S,
           FUTURE PERSPECTIVES                                   Bouffet E, Clifford SC, Hawkins CE, French P, Rutka JT, Pfister S, Taylor
                                                                 MD Medulloblastoma comprises four distinct molecular variants. J Clin
           Main emphasis for improving current in vitro technologies   Oncol 2011;29:1408-14.
           should be given to the cellular composition and the   4.   Kool M, Koster J, Bunt J, Hasselt NE, Lakeman A, van Sluis P, Troost
           biophysical and chemical environment conditions under   D, Meeteren NS, Caron HN, Cloos J, Mrsić A, Ylstra B, Grajkowska W,
                                                                 Hartmann W, Pietsch T, Ellison D, Clifford SC, Versteeg R. Integrated
           which the experiment is performed. The microenvironment   genomics identifies five medulloblastoma subtypes with distinct genetic
           of the in vivo location of the tumor and the composition of   profiles, pathway signatures and clinicopathological features. PLoS One
           the neuronal and interstitial cells resident in this location   2008;3:e3088.
           should guide the choice of the components. At the single   5.   Thompson MC, Fuller C, Hogg TL, Dalton J, Finkelstein D, Lau CC,
           cell and population levels, molecular sensors for specific cell   Chintagumpala M,  Adesina  A,  Ashley DM, Kellie SJ,  Taylor MD,
                                                                 Curran T, Gajjar A, Gilbertson RJ. Genomics identifies medulloblastoma
           functions should be used for probing tumor cell behavior   subgroups that are enriched for specific genetic alterations. J Clin Oncol
           and  therapeutic  efficacy.  Finally,  an  increased  output   2006;24:1924-31.
           should be strived for to enable pharmacological and genetic   6.   Wang X, Dubuc AM, Ramaswamy V, Mack S, Gendoo DM, Remke
           screening approaches for drug target identification. Thus, an   M, Wu X, Garzia L, Luu B, Cavalli F, Peacock J, López B, Skowron
                                                                 P, Zagzag D, Lyden D, Hoffman C, Cho YJ, Eberhart C, MacDonald T,
           organotypic  environment,  specific  read-outs  and  the  high   Li XN, Van Meter T, Northcott PA, Haibe-Kains B, Hawkins C, Rutka
           throughput capability will be the three pillars of future in vitro   JT, Bouffet E, Pfister SM, Korshunov A, Taylor MD. Medulloblastoma
           approaches. A great potential lies in organotypic slice culture,   subgroups remain stable across primary and metastatic compartments.
           and when this technology is combined with state-of-the-art   Acta neuropathol 2015;129:449-57.
           microscopy, it will allow to reveal fundamental aspects of   7.   Angers-Loustau A, Hering R, Werbowetski TE, Kaplan DR, Del Maestro
                                                                 RF. SRC regulates actin dynamics and invasion of malignant glial cells in
           local tumor cell infiltration, the interaction of neuronal and   three dimensions. Mol Cancer Res 2004;2:595-605.
           brain interstitial cell populations with the tumor cells and the   8.   Le PU,  Angers-Loustau  A, de Oliveira RM,  Ajlan  A, Brassard CL,
           evaluation of the efficaciousness of novel treatments.  Dudley A, Brent H, Siu V, Trinh G, Mölenkamp G, Wang J, Seyed Sadr
                                                                 M, Bedell B, Del Maestro RF, Petrecca K. DRR drives brain cancer
           Financial support and sponsorship                     invasion by regulating cytoskeletal-focal adhesion dynamics. Oncogene
           A.N. is supported by a grant of the  Werner and Hedy   9.   2010;29:4636-47.
                                                                 Santhana Kumar K, Tripolitsioti D, Ma M, Grahlert J, Egli KB, Fiaschetti
           Berger-Janser Foundation, M.B. by the Childhood Cancer   G, Shalaby  T, Grotzer MA, Baumgartner M.  The Ser/Thr kinase
           Research Foundation Switzerland.                      MAP4K4 drives c-Met-induced motility and invasiveness in a cell-based
                                                                 model of SHH medulloblastoma. SpringerPlus 2015;4:19.
           Conflicts of interest                              10.  Rottner K, Stradal TE. Actin dynamics and turnover in cell motility. Curr
                                                                 Opin Cell Biol 2011;23:569-78.
           There are no conflicts of interest.                11.  Hall A. The cytoskeleton and cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2009;28:5-
                                                                 14.
           REFERENCES                                         12.  Nurnberg A, Kitzing T, Grosse R. Nucleating actin for invasion. Nat Rev
                                                                 Cancer 2011;11:177-87.
           1.   Taylor MD, Northcott PA, Korshunov A, Remke M, Cho YJ, Clifford   13.  Giese  A, Bjerkvig R, Berens ME,  Westphal M. Cost of migration:
               SC Eberhart CG, Parsons DW, Rutkowski S, Gajjar A, Ellison DW,   invasion of malignant gliomas and implications for treatment. J Clin
               Lichter P, Gilbertson RJ, Pomeroy SL, Kool M, Pfister SM. Molecular   Oncol 2003;21:1624-36.
               subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus. Acta neuropathol   14.  Waclaw B, Bozic I, Pittman ME, Hruban RH, Vogelstein B, Nowak MA.
               2012;123:465-72.                                  A spatial model predicts that dispersal and cell turnover limit intratumour
           2.   Northcott PA, Shih DJ, Peacock J, Garzia L, Morrissy AS, Zichner T, Stütz   heterogeneity. Nat 2015;525:261-4.
               AM, Korshunov A, Reimand J, Schumacher SE, Beroukhim R, Ellison   15.  Palmer TD, Ashby WJ, Lewis JD, Zijlstra A. Targeting tumor cell motility
               DW, Marshall CR, Lionel AC, Mack S, Dubuc A, Yao Y, Ramaswamy V,   to prevent metastasis. AdvDrug Deliv Rev 2011;63:568-81.
               Luu B, Rolider A, Cavalli FM, Wang X, Remke M, Wu X, Chiu RY, Chu   16.  Vehlow A, Cordes N. Invasion as target for therapy of glioblastoma
               A, Chuah E, Corbett RD, Hoad GR, Jackman SD, Li Y, Lo A, Mungall   multiforme. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013;1836:236-44.
               KL, Nip KM, Qian JQ, Raymond AG, Thiessen NT, Varhol RJ, Birol   17.  Wells A, Grahovac J, Wheeler S, Ma B, Lauffenburger D. Targeting
               I, Moore RA, Mungall AJ, Holt R, Kawauchi D, Roussel MF, Kool M,   tumor cell motility as a strategy against invasion and metastasis. Trends
               Jones DT, Witt H, Fernandez-L A, Kenney AM, Wechsler-Reya RJ, Dirks   Pharmacol Sci 2013;34:283-9.
               P, Aviv T, Grajkowska WA, Perek-Polnik M, Haberler CC, Delattre O,   18.  Wolf K, Friedl P. Extracellular matrix determinants of proteolytic and
               Reynaud SS, Doz FF, Pernet-Fattet SS, Cho BK, Kim SK, Wang KC,   non-proteolytic cell migration. Trends Cell Biol 2011;21:736-44.
               Scheurlen W, Eberhart CG, Fèvre-Montange M, Jouvet A, Pollack IF,   19.  Ulrich TA, Jain A, Tanner K, MacKay JL, Kumar S. Probing cellular
               Fan X, Muraszko KM, Gillespie GY, Di Rocco C, Massimi L, Michiels   mechanobiology in three-dimensional culture with collagen-agarose
               EM, Kloosterhof NK, French PJ, Kros JM, Olson JM, Ellenbogen RG,   matrices. Biomaterials 2010;31:1875-84.
               Zitterbart K, Kren L, Thompson RC, Cooper MK, Lach B, McLendon   20.  Friedl P, Wolf K. Plasticity of cell migration: a multiscale tuning model. J

           160
                                                                                                                         Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ¦ Volume 2 ¦ May 18, 2016 ¦
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68