Page 134 - Read Online

Songthumjitti et al. Intell Robot 2023;3(3):306-36 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2023.20 Page 31 of 31

Financial support and sponsorship
None.

Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.

Consent for publication
Not applicable.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.

REFERENCES
1. Villani V, Pini F, Leali F, Secchi C. Survey on human-robot collaboration in industrial settings: safety, intuitive interfaces and applications.
Mechatronics 2018;55:248-66. DOI
2. Matheson E, Minto R, Zampieri EGG, Faccio M, Rosati G. Human-robot collaboration in manufacturing applications: a review. Robotics
2019;8:100. DOI
3. Hentout A, Aouache M, Maoudj A, Akli I. Human-robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: a literature review of the decade
2008 - 2017. Advanced Robotics2019;33:764-99. DOI
4. Krüger J, Lien T, Verl A. Cooperation of human and machines in assembly lines. CIRP Annals 2009;58:628-46. DOI
5. Keemink AQ, van der Kooij H, Stienen AH. Admittance control for physical human-robot interaction. Int J Rob Res 2018;37:1421-44.
DOI
6. Lawrence DA. Impedance control stability properties in common implementations. In: Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference
on Robotics and Automation; 1988. p.1185-90. DOI
7. Tsumugiwa T, Yokogawa R, Yoshida K. Stability analysis for impedance control of robot for human-robot cooperative task system. In:
Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2004. p. 3883-8. DOI
8. Calanca A, Muradore R, Fiorini P. A review of algorithms for compliant control of stiff and fixed-compliance robots. IEEE/ASME Trans
Mechatron 2016;21:613-24. DOI
9. Tsumugiwa T, Fuchikami Y, Kamiyoshi A, Yokogawa R, Yoshida K. Stability analysis for impedance control of robot in human-robot
cooperative task system. J Adv Mech Des Systs Manufacturing 2007;1:113-21. DOI
10. Sharkawy A, Koustoumpardis PN. Human-robot interaction: a review and analysis on variable admittance control, safety, and perspectives.
Machines 2022;10:591. DOI
11. Kang G, Oh HS, Seo JK, Kim U, Choi HR. Variable admittance control of robot manipulators based on human intention. IEEE/ASME
Trans Mechatron 2019;24:1023-32. DOI
12. Lecours A, Mayer-St-Onge B, Gosselin C. Variable admittance control of a four-degree-of-freedom intelligent assist device. In:2012
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2012. p. 3903-8 DOI
13. Dimeas F. Online stability in human-robot cooperation with admittance control. IEEE Trans Haptics 2016;9:267-78. DOI
14. Ferraguti F, Talignani Landi C, Sabattini L, Bonfè M, Fantuzzi C, Secchi C. A variable admittance control strategy for stable physical
human - robot interaction. Int J Rob Res2019;38:747-65. DOI
15. Müller F, Janetzky J, Behrnd U, Jäkel J, Thomas U. User force-dependent variable impedance control in human-robot interaction. In:
2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE);2018. p. 1328-35. DOI
16. Buerger SP, Hogan N. Complementary stability and loop shaping for improved human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 2007;23:232-
44. DOI
17. Narawich SONGTHUMJITTI, Takeshi INABA, Modeling and stability analysis of an admittance-controlled cartesian robot considering
physical interaction with humans. In: The 23rd Conference of The System Integration Division, The Society of Instrument and Control
Engineering, 3P3-E18 (2022)
18. Inaba T, Shu U. Control of power assist system for easy positioning consideration to maneuverability depending on task direction and
operator’s posture. IEEJ Trans EIS 2014;134:1130-7. DOI
19. Inaba T, Matsuo Y. Loop-shaping characteristics of a human operator in a force reflective manual control system. In: Systems, Man, and
Cybernetics, 1997. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation, 1997 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1995. DOI
20. Keviczky L, Bars R, Hetthéssy J, Bányász C. Control engineering. Springer Singapore(2019). DOI