Page 773 - Read Online
P. 773

Yoneoka et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:67                            Hepatoma Research
               DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2020.57




               Original Article                                                              Open Access


               Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in
               radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma



               Grant Yoneoka , Kliment Bozhilov , Linda L. Wong 1,2
                            1
                                            1,2
               1 Transplant Center, The Queen’s Medical Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
               2 Department of Surgery, University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Linda L. Wong, Department of Surgery, University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, 550
               South Beretania Street, Suite 403, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. E-mail: hepatoma@aol.com
               How to cite this article: Yoneoka G, Bozhilov K, Wong LL. Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization
               for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:67. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.57
               Received: 5 Jun 2020    First Decision: 5 Aug 2020    Revised: 18 Aug 2020    Accepted: 31 Aug 2020    Published: 12 Oct 2020

               Academic Editor: Guang-Wen Cao    Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang    Production Editor: Jing Yu


               Abstract
               Aim: Inflammation-based markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte
 Received:     First Decision:     Revised:     Accepted:    Published:
               ratio (PLR), have recently been used as prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to
 Science Editor:     Copy Editor:     Production Editor: Jing Yu   determine whether NLR and PLR may predict response to yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) as
               primary treatment for HCC.


               Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of HCC cases (1994-2019)
               and selected patients who received TARE as primary treatment (n = 42). Laboratory studies were used to calculate
               NLR and PLR. Response to TARE was determined using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors
               (mRECIST). Patients were classified as non-responders (stable or progressive disease) or responders (partial or
               complete response) to treatment based on mRECIST.

               Results: Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a pre-treatment NLR cutoff of ≥ 2.83 and a pre-
               treatment PLR cutoff of ≥ 83 for predicting non-response to treatment. Pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 was the only
               significant predictor of non-response to TARE in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 7.83, P
               = 0.036). On time to progression analysis, both pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 and pre-treatment PLR ≥ 83 were
               associated with a higher proportion of tumor progression at 6 months post-treatment (43.6% vs . 10.0%, P =
               0.014, log-rank) and (38.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.010, log-rank), respectively.


               Conclusion: NLR confers prognostic value and may be superior to PLR in determining response to TARE as primary
               treatment for HCC. Future studies are necessary to validate these findings in a larger cohort.

                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                        www.hrjournal.net
   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778