Page 81 - Read Online
P. 81

Ban et al. Hepatoma Res 2021;7:13  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.104                                             Page 7 of 8

               be the reverse of the order. The hepatic vein has often been used as an indicator of hepatic dissection in
               anatomical liver resection. However, since anatomical liver resection is performed in the vascular supply
               area of the portal vein, hepatic vein-guided liver resection may not be synonymous with anatomical
               resection. In addition, a hepatectomy method using the hepatic vein as a guide has been proposed until
               now, but the terms have not been unified. In the future, it will be important to demonstrate the usefulness
               of this technique for hepatectomy using the hepatic vein as a reference point. Also, the terminology for
               the approach is not entirely consistent. Therefore, it is expected that these procedures will be discussed at
               consensus conferences in the future.


               CONCLUSION
               It should be recognized that the hepatic vein provides a useful structure to guide liver transection for
               LLR. It is also an anatomical landmark, to a lesser extent, in open hepatectomy. In the planning of hepatic
               transection, it is recommended that the hepatic vein be utilized as the boundary of the transection or a
               landmark that serves as an anatomical reference point.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Manuscript writing and operator of LLR: Ban D
               Substantial contributions to conception: Esaki M, Shimada K
               Technical supports and interpretation: Nara S, Takemoto T
               Performed data acquisition, and drawing the figures: Mizui T, Yoshino J

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2021.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Ban D, Tanabe M, Kumamaru H, et al. Safe dissemination of laparoscopic liver resection in 27,146 cases between 2011 and 2017 from
                   the national clinical database of Japan. Ann Surg 2020; doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003799.
               2.   Cho JY, Han HS, Choi Y, et al. Association of remnant liver ischemia with early recurrence and poor survival after liver resection in
                   patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Surg 2017;152:386-92.
               3.   Yamashita S, Venkatesan AM, Mizuno T, et al. Remnant liver ischemia as a prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival after resection
                   of colorectal liver metastases. JAMA Surg 2017;152:e172986.
               4.   Nomi T, Hokuto D, Yoshikawa T, Matsuo Y, Sho M. A novel navigation for laparoscopic anatomic liver resection using indocyanine green
                   fluorescence. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:3982.
               5.   Urade T, Sawa H, Iwatani Y, et al. Laparoscopic anatomical liver resection using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging. Asian J Surg
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86