Page 95 - Read Online
P. 95

Karademir. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:58  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.40                                               Page 5 of 18
































               Figure 1. BCLC staging system. PS: performance status; OS:overall survival; BCLC:Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer

               Another issue regarding GRETCH score is use of ultrasound in face of recent advances in imaging. More
               informative techniques rather than ultrasound may be used to evaluate portal venous anatomy.


               Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification
                                                                                                 [3]
               The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification for HCC was proposed by Llovet et al.  in 1999.
               The BCLC staging system is developed from the results obtained in the setting of several cohort studies and
               RCTs [1,3,28] . As it is not based on identification of prognostic factors from a regression analysis, BCLC is not
                                                     [26]
               able to predict the mortality in HCC patients . The notable feature of BCLC is being the first system which
               recommends evidence-based clinical treatment for each patient at different stages [Figure 1]. Its treatment
               algorithm has also been recognized as a guideline by renown societies (the American Association for the
               Study of Liver Diseases, the American Gastroenterological Association and European Association for the
               Study of the Liver) for management of HCC [29,30] .

               BCLC includes predictors of prognosis in HCC patients including tumor extension, liver functional reserve
               and overall physical status (PS). Tumor extension contains the number of tumors, tumor size and presence
               of portal vein invasion or extrahepatic metastasis. Child-Pugh grade is replaced for liver functional reserve
               and the PS is determined by corresponding Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance
                    [31]
               status . Patients are subsequently assigned to five categories (0, A, B, C and D) based on these variables: stage
               0 (very early stage) describes patients with well-preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A), one asymptomatic
               tumor < 2 cm and no vascular invasion or satellites. Stage A (early stage) covers Child-Pugh A or B patients
               with one tumor of any size or 2-3 tumors all < 3 cm. Stage B (intermediate-stage) defines patients with Child-
               Pugh A or B status, multiple tumors without vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis.  Child- Pugh A
               or B patients with vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis of tumor and in relatively good PS (1-2) are
               assigned to stage C (advanced stage). Finally, stage D (terminal stage) corresponds to patients with Child-
               Pugh C status in any tumor stage and poor PS (> 2) [3,32] .

               Overall, the BCLC staging system identifies early, intermediate, advanced, and end stage HCC patients
               who may benefit from curative therapies, palliative treatments or best supportive care. Curative treatment
               options such as surgical resection, liver transplantation and ablation are recommended for patients with
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100