Page 92 - Read Online
P. 92

Page 2 of 18                                                 Karademir. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:58  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.40


               Table 1. Components of HCC scores and staging systems published in the recent years
                                                                        Tumor status
                                Liver functional   Performance
                Staging systems                           AFP               Vascular             Other
                                  reserve   status, symptoms   Number  Size         Metastasis
                                                                            invasion
                Okuda (1985) [6]  Ascites, albumin,                    Yes
                                bilirubin
                CLIP (1998) [7]  Child-Pugh score         Yes   Yes    Yes    Yes
                French (1999) [8]  Bilirubin  Karnofsky scale  Yes            Yes              Alk-P, PVT
                BCLC (1999) [3]  Child-Pugh score  EGOS PST     Yes    Yes    Yes     Yes
                AJCC TNM-7 (2010) [5]                           Yes    Yes    Yes     Yes
                CUPI (2002) [9]  Ascites, bilirubin  Symptoms  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes     Yes      Alk-P
                JIS (2003) [10]  Child-Pugh score               Yes    Yes    Yes     Yes
                m-JIS (2006) [57]  +ICG-R15 (-                  Yes    Yes    Yes     Yes
                                encepalopathy)
                bm-JIS (2008) [58]  Child-Pugh score      Yes   Yes    Yes    Yes     Yes      AFP-L3, DCP
                Tokyo (2005) [11]  Albumin, bilirubin           Yes    Yes
                BALAD (2006) [60]  Albumin, bilirubin     Yes                                  AFP-L3, DCP
                ALPCS (2008) [48]  Child-Pugh score  Symptoms  Yes     Yes            Yes      Alk-P, Urea, PVT
                TIS (2010) [63]  Child-Pugh score         Yes  Total tumor volume
                MESIAH (2012) [12]  MELD, albumin  Age    Yes   Yes    Yes    Yes     Yes
                HKLC (2014) [4]  Child-Pugh score  EGOS PST  No  Yes   Yes    Yes     Yes
                ITA.LI.CA (2016) [68]  Child-Pugh score  EGOS PST  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes
               HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; CLIP: Cancer of the Liver Italian Program; BCLC: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; AJCC: American Joint
               Committee of Cancer; TNM: tumor-node-metastasis; CUPI: Chinese University Prognostic Index; JIS: Japan Integrated Staging; m-JIS:
               modified JIS; bm-JIS: biomarker combined JIS; BALAD: bilirubin-albumin-AFPL3-AFP-DCP; ALPCS: advanced liver cancer prognostic
               system; TIS: Taipei Integrated Scoring System; MESIAH: model to estimate survival in ambulatory HCC; HKLC: Hong Kong Liver Cancer;
               AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; AFP-L3: AFP-Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive; DCP: des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin; EGOS PST: Eastern
               Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; ICG-R15: indocyanine green clearance; PVT: portal vein thrombosis


               search for a simple, reliable, reproducible and comprehensive staging system continues.

               Most HCCs develop upon chronic diseases of the liver, mainly B or C viral hepatitis. Due to the underlying
               liver disease, prognosis of HCC depends not only on extend of the tumor but also on functional reserve of
               liver, overall health status of the patient and the treatment given for HCC . For an accurate prognostication
                                                                             [2]
               of HCC, parameters which look at all these aspects of prognosis must be included in staging process. In
               addressing interrelationship of prognostic factors in HCC, several staging systems have been developed but
               only a few have been widely used and validated.

               To date, various parameters have been studied to be of prognostic usefulness in patients with HCC.
               Parameters based on systematic reviews of the literature and/or expert opinions  as well as variables
                                                                                      [3-5]
               that were significant in multivariable Cox survival analyses [6-12]  were incorporated in these staging/
               scoring systems. Besides the simple patient related demographic data such as age and gender, many other
               specific biochemical and clinical variables of liver function, tumor burden and biology as well as age-
               related clinical consequences and comorbidities have been included in regression analysis of the different
                                          [1]
               studied populations worldwide  [Table 1]. Several biomarkers have also been studied for their prognostic
                                           [13]
               significance in patients with HCC .
               The treatment options for patients with HCC are expanding. Depending on the stage of the disease, surgical
               resection, percutaneous ablation, transarterial chemoembolization and transplantation are being performed
               either singly or as combination of various modalities. For patients with advanced disease, sorafenib, a
               multikinase inhibitor is also available. The choice of therapy is influenced by several factors including stage
               of tumor and severity of underlying liver dysfunction as well as availability of resources and of expertise.
               Thus, to reach a single staging system and treatment algorithm applicable to all patients with HCC seems to
               continue to be challenging.
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97