Page 91 - Read Online
P. 91

Karademir. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:58                                Hepatoma Research
               DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2018.40


               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma

               Sedat Karademir

               Department of General Surgery, Section of HPB Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Ankara Guven Hospital, Ankara 06540, Turkey.

               Correspondence to: Prof. Sedat Karademir, Department of General Surgery, Section of HPB Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Ankara
               Guven Hospital, Ankara 06540, Turkey. E-mail: sedatkarademir@gmail.com

               How to cite this article: Karademir S. Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:58.
               http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.40

               Received: 16 Apr 2018    First Decision: 29 Jun 2018    Revised: 13 Aug 2018    Accepted: 22 Aug 2018    Published: 26 Sep 2018
               Science Editor: Guang-Wen Cao    Copy Editor: Yuan-Li Wang    Production Editor: Zhong-Yu Guo



               Abstract
               Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths in the world. In contrast to other
               cancers, survival of patients with HCC is determined by the extent of the tumor in addition to underlying liver
               disease and its functional reserve. From risk factors to management, HCC reveals a considerable geographic and
               institutional variation throughout the world. Although many staging and/or scoring systems have been proposed,
               each prognostic system has several benefits and limitations on its own. Therefore, there is currently no globally
               accepted system for HCC due to the extreme heterogeneity of the disease. In this review, currently available
               staging systems for assessing the prognosis of HCC, their uses, limitations, and future prospects are revisited.


               Keywords: Hepatocellular cancer, staging and scoring systems, risk factors, survival





               INTRODUCTION
               Cancer staging systems are important for identification of appropriate therapies and prediction of prognosis
               for individual patients. Staging in cancer also helps to create a common language in clinical investigations and
                      [1]
               research . Since last 2 decades, several staging systems have been proposed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
               However, no single system has been universally accepted. Each staging system reflects the features of its own
               patient population that has been studied on. From risk factors to the treatment given for HCC, considerable
               geographic and institutional variations exist worldwide. In addition to heterogeneity of the tumor, in each
               country, availability of surveillance programs, quality of medical technology and accessibility to treatment may
               influence the prognosis of HCC patients. A staging system which is found to be useful in Western countries
               may not be similarly suitable for Eastern population. However, external validation of a proposed system for
               different patient groups worldwide is crucial to reach a common guideline for the management of HCC. So, the


                           © The Author(s) 2018. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                    www.hrjournal.net
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96