Page 98 - Read Online
P. 98

Page 8 of 18                                                 Karademir. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:58  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.40


                          Table 6. Japanese Staging System (LCSGJ-TNM) [55]  and Japan Integrated Staging (JIS) score [10]
                          LCSGJ-TNM
                          T criteria
                              Single tumor
                              Size < 2 cm
                              No vascular involvement
                              T1                                    All 3 features
                              T2                                    2 of 3 features
                              T3                                    1 of 3 features
                              T4                                    None of 3 features
                              Stage I                               T1 N0 M0
                              Stage II                              T2 N0 M0
                              Stage III                             T3 N0 M0
                              Stage IVA                             T4 N0 M0 or any T N1 M0
                              Stage IVB                             Any T N0-1 M1
                          Japan Integrated Staging (JIS)
                              Stage I                               0
                              Stage II                              1
                              Stage III                             2
                              Stage IV                              3
                              Child-Pugh A                          0
                              Child-Pugh B                          1
                              Child-Pugh C                          2
                          LCSGJ: Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan; TNM: tumor-node-metastasis, TNM: tumor-node-metastasis

               developed based solely on Japanese HCC patients, prospective validation studies are required in Western
               population. The other limitations inherent in the LCSGJ staging system such as inaccurate weighting of size
               and vascular involvement as well as the lack of incorporation of microscopic pathology information remain.

               This score was further improved a few years later with the modified-JIS in which the encephalopathy item
               is replaced by the indocyanine green clearance (ICG-R15), due to an early HCC screening in Japan and a
                                        [57]
               preferred surgical orientation . The substitution of ICG-R15 for encephalopathy in Child-Pugh grade might
               have reflected individual differences more accurately among patients who underwent hepatic resection,
                                                                                           [57]
               because none of the patients in the present study had any encephalopathy before operation .
               JIS has been recently refined as biomarker combined JIS (bm-JIS) by including AFP, AFP-Lens culinaris
               agglutinin-reactive (AFP-L3) and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) which allowed better survival
                         [58]
               predictions . However, two of those markers are not frequently used in Western countries where HCC is
               also often being diagnosed at more advanced stages. Thus, this score has not been evaluated on patients from
               Western countries.


               CUPI score
               The CUPI for HCC was identified on the basis of a cohort of 926 Chinese patients, most of them with
                                                     [9]
               hepatitis B virus (HBV) related cirrhosis . CUPI combines the conventional TNM system and a
               number of other factors of liver function and tumor load (serum bilirubin, ascites, ALP, serum AFP and
               asymptomatic disease on presentation) [Table 7]. Patients are subsequently divided into three groups (low-
               risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk) according to the sum of the weights of the six prognostic factors. The
               median survival for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups were 10.1 months, 3.7 months and
               1.4 months, respectively. The authors estimate that this classification has better estimation of survival than
               CLIP score and Okuda stage, although its discriminatory power in early stages is questionable, as the best
               1-year survival was around 50%. In 2011, the group validated the CUPI system in another cohort of 595 HCC
                                                  [59]
               patients with predominant HBV infection .
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103