Page 17 - Read Online
P. 17

Page 2 of 35              Tao et al. Energy Mater 2022;2:200036  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/energymater.2022.46

               market demand for lithium-ion batteries, which have high energy density and good long-term cycle
               performance. A lithium-ion battery is mainly composed of a cathode, such as lithium cobalt oxide, lithium
               manganese oxide, lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide or lithium iron phosphate, an electrolyte, a
               separator and an anode, such as graphite. At present, traditional Li-ion batteries cannot meet the desired
               storage requirements due to their limited theoretical specific capacity and safety issues . Thus, the
                                                                                               [1]
               development of novel energy storage energy systems has become a significant challenge. Lithium-sulfur
               batteries (LSBs) have received substantial attention due to their high energy density, environmental
               friendliness and low cost. However, liquid electrolyte LSBs are limited by low Coulombic efficiency and fast
               capacity degradation because of the polysulfide dissolution and shuttling. The toxicity and flammability of
               liquid electrolytes also cause safety concerns. All-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries (ASSLSBs) are regarded
               as potential substitutes. ASSLSBs contain a metallic lithium-based anode, solid-state electrolyte (SSE) and
               sulfur-based cathode. The use of a nonflammable SSE can suppress the polysulfide dissolution, eliminate the
                                                                    [2,3]
               shuttle effect and restrain the formation of lithium dendrites . Furthermore, ASSLSBs show additional
               advantages, including reduced wasted volume and net weight, low self-discharge, high operating voltages
                                          [4-6]
               and excellent thermal stability . A comparison between liquid electrolyte-based LSBs and ASSLSBs is
               shown in Table 1.

               A variety of SSEs, including organic polymer electrolytes (PEs), inorganic solid-state electrolytes (ISSEs) and
               PE and ISSE composites, have been investigated extensively [11,12] . The fabrication of ideal SSEs should
               consider their mechanical strength, electrochemical window, chemical stability, cost and ionic conductivity.
               Generally, ISSEs can be classified into two categories: oxide solid electrolytes and sulfide solid electrolytes.
               PEs include solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) and gel polymer electrolytes. Each type of SSE has its own
               relative merits. For example, ISSEs show higher ion conductivities at operating temperature, while PEs
               exhibit lower hardness, better interfacial contact and lighter weight. Thus, novel composite electrolytes may
               be enlightening in improving the performance of ASSLSBs because of their potential multifold benefits.

               After decades of research, it is now clear that the main obstacle facing ASSLSB development is no longer
               improving the ionic conductivity of the SSEs but has instead shifted towards increasing the interfacial
               compatibility between the SSE and electrodes. The different interfacial nature of the electrode/SSE interface,
               in comparison with the electrode/liquid electrolyte interface, easily causes significant interfacial
               resistance [13-16] . A good electrode/solid electrolyte interface should have excellent chemical and mechanical
               stability, high ion transport and maximum contact area during cycling. Currently, the electrode/electrolyte
               interface remains an important challenge that is limiting the possible commercialization of ASSLSBs. The
               resistance at the interfaces between the electrodes (anode and cathode) and SSEs is usually large. Favorable
               interfacial compatibility, contact and chemical stability are critical to improving the electrochemical
               properties of ASSLSBs [Figure 1].


               Although a number of impactful reviews have summarized the progress and prospects of ASSLSBs,
               including SSEs, metallic lithium-based anodes and sulfur- and Li S-based cathodes, few reviews have
                                                                          2
               specifically  focused  on  the  electrode/SSE  interfaces  in  ASSLSBs [18-23] . Therefore,  to  improve  the
               understanding of the role of the solid/solid interfaces in these systems, this review provides a comprehensive
               summary and analysis based on the key interfacial challenges of electrode/SSE interfaces, including metallic
               lithium-based anodes/SSEs and sulfur- and Li S-based cathodes/SSEs, and SSE/SSE interfaces. The advanced
                                                     2
               strategies employed to resolve these interfacial issues are also introduced.

               Evolution and classifications of ASSLSBs
               Evolution
               In order to understand the role of solid/solid interfaces in ASSLSBs, the evolution and classifications of
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22