Page 82 - Read Online

Page 20 of 23 Tan et al. Complex Eng Syst 2023;3:6 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ces.2023.10

1
x 11 (t)
x 12 (t)
0
-1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
State Response 0 x 21 (t)
1
x 22 (t)
-1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2
x 31 (t)
x 32 (t)
0
-2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time(s)
Figure 2. The state’s response of dynamic METM with M = 2. METM: memory event-triggered mechanism.

1
x 11 (t)
x 12 (t)
0
-1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
State Response 0 x 21 (t)
1
x 22 (t)
-1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5
x 31 (t)
x 32 (t)
0
-5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time(s)

Figure 3. The state’s response without control input.

0.3
u 1 (t)
u 2 (t)
0.2
u 3 (t)
0.1
Control Input -0.1 0

-0.2

-0.3
-0.4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time(s)

Figure 4. The control input of the three systems.

of the developed method, which illustrates the proposed dynamic METM can save more network resources