Page 15 - Read Online
P. 15

Fan et al. Complex Eng Syst 2023;3:5  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ces.2023.04   Page 11 of 15


                                                P 1    9 1               P 2    9 2


                                        F 1                     F 2
                                                                                     K 3
                                   K 1                      K 2
                                               M 1                      M 2
                                   C 1                     C 2                      C 3
                                       f ȝ1                     f ȝ2


                                   Figure 2. Simple diagram of the interconnected mass–spring–damper system.


                                                            2 =    2 ,                                 (49)
                                                          ¤

                                     ¤                                                 .               (50)
                                     2    2 = −   3    2 −    3    2 +    2 (   1 −    2 ) +    2 (   1 −    2 ) +    2 −       2
                                                                               . Inthesameway, welet    21 =    2,
               Fortheobject    1, wedefine    11 =    1,    12 =    1, ¯   1 (   1 ) =    1, and    1 (   1 ) =       1
                                                 for the object    2. Next, the state-space of the spring-mass-damper
                  22 =    2, ¯   2 (   2 ) =    2, and    2 (   2 ) =       2
               system is written as
                                       "               #   "    #                 "     #

                                ¤    11          12          0                       0
                          ¤    1 =   =        1      1   +   1   ( ¯   1 (   1 ) +    1 (  )) +  1     1 (   1 )  (51)
                                ¤    12  −      11 −     12                        −
                                              1      1          1                       1
               and
                                       "               #  "    #                 "      #

                                ¤    21          22          0                      0
                          ¤    2 =   =       3      3   +    1   ( ¯   2 (   2 ) +    2 (  )) +  1     2 (   2 ) ,  (52)
                                ¤    22  −     21 −     22                         −
                                             2      2          2                        2
                                 T    2                T    2
               where    1 = [   11 ,    12 ]  ∈ R and    2 = [   21 ,    22 ]  ∈ R are system states. ¯   1 (   1 ) ∈ R, ¯   2 (   2 ) ∈ R,    1 (   1 ) ∈ R,
               and    2 (   2 ) ∈ R are control inputs and disturbance inputs of the subsystem 1 and the subsystem 2, respectively.
               Simultaneously,    1 (  ) =    2 (   21 −    11 ) +    2 (   22 −    12 ) and    2 (  ) =    2 (   11 −    21 ) +    2 (   12 −    22 ), which

               indicates the spring    2 and the damping    2 play a connecting role for two subsystems. Herein, we let    1 (   1 ) =
               ||   1 || and    2 (   2 ) = |   22 |. Besides, we choose    11 =    12 = 1,    21 =    22 = 1/2, and    1 =    2 = 1. Moreover,
               we select    1 =    2 = 0.6,    1 =    2 = 1,    1 =    2 = 2, and    1 =    2 = 2   4, where    4 is the four-dimensional
               identity matrix. Above all, the desired reference trajectories    1 and    2 for two subsystems are generated by the
               following command system:


                                           ¤      1  −0.5     1 − 0.5     2 cos (     1 )
                                      ¤       =  =                        ,     = 1, 2,                (53)
                                           ¤      2    sin (     1 ) − 0.5     2
                                 T     2                T     2
               where    1 = [   11 ,    12 ]  ∈ R and    2 = [   21 ,    22 ]  ∈ R are reference states. Then, we define the tracking
               errors as      1 =      1 −      1 and      2 =      2 −      2. Hence, the augmented state vector can be expressed as       =
                             T                T
               [     1 ,      2 ,      3 ,      4 ]  = [     1 ,      2 ,      1 ,      2 ] ,    = 1, 2. We set practical parameters as    1 = 1kg,    1 = 3N/m, and
                  1 = 0.5Ns/m for the subsystem 1. Similarly, we let    2 = 2kg,    3 = 5N/m, and    3 = 1Ns/m for the subsystem
               2. Considering Equations (51-53), the augmented system dynamics ¤   1 and ¤   2 can be obtained in the following
               forms:


                                     12 +    12 + 0.5   11 + 0.5   12 cos (   11 )      0      0  
                                                                                       
                                                                                       
                            −3(   11 +    11 ) − 0.5(   12 +    12 ) − sin (   11 ) + 0.5   12    1    −1   (54)
                       ¤    1 =                                       +    ¯   1 (   1 ) +       1 (   1 )
                                     −0.5   11 − 0.5   12 cos (   11 )     0        0 
                                                                                       
                                         sin (   11 ) − 0.5   12        0           0 
                                                                                       
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20