Page 47 - 2417

Chaib et al. Carbon Footprints 2026, 5, 23 Page 23 of 23

74. Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA). Viabilidade econômica de sistemas produtivos com cacau: pleno sol e
sistemas agroflorestais nos estados da Bahia e do Pará. Available from: h​t​t​p​s​:​/​/​w​w​w​.​g​o​v​.​b​r​/​a​g​r​i​c​u​l​t​u​r​a​/​p​t​-​b​r​/​a​s​s​u​n​t​o​s​/​s​u​s​t​e​n​t​a​b​i​l​i​d​a​d​e​/​c​o
​
​
​
​
​
​
coaactionbrasi​l [Last accessed on 29 Apr 2026] (in Portuguese).
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
75. DATAGRO. Brazilian agriculture yearbook 2022; São Paulo, Brazil, 2022. Available from: h​t​t​p​:​/​/​p​o​r​t​a​l​.​d​a​t​a​g​r​o​.​c​o​m​.​b​r​ [Last accessed
on 29 Apr 2026].
76. Carlos, S. M.; Assad, E. D.; Estevam, C. G.; et al. Costs of recovering degraded pastures in the Brazilian States and biomes;
Observatório de Conhecimento e Inovação em Bioeconomia, Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV-EESP): São Paulo, Brazil, 2022. Available
from: h​t​t​p​s​:​/​/​a​g​r​o​.​f​g​v​.​b​r​/​s​i​t​e​s​/​d​e​f​a​u​l​t​/​f​i​l​e​s​/​2​0​2​3​-​0​2​/​c​o​s​t​s​_​o​f​_​r​e​c​o​v​e​r​i​n​g​_​d​e​g​r​a​d​e​d​_​p​a​s​t​u​r​e​s​_​i​n​_​t​h​e​_​b​r​a​z​i​l​i​a​n​_​s​t​a​t​e​s​_​a​n​d​_​b​i​o​m​e​s​_​0​.​p​d​f​
[Last accessed on 29 Apr 2026].
77. World Bank. Financial resilience against climate shocks and disasters: recent progress and new frontiers; Washington, DC, USA, 2023.
Available from: h​t​t​p​s​:​/​/​d​o​c​u​m​e​n​t​s​1​.​w​o​r​l​d​b​a​n​k​.​o​r​g​/​c​u​r​a​t​e​d​/​e​n​/​0​9​9​7​3​2​5​1​1​0​7​2​3​1​4​2​2​7​/​p​d​f​/​I​D​U​0​8​9​3​b​a​7​8​6​0​5​d​c​8​0​4​8​f​5​0​9​1​f​7​0​8​9​3​e​e​2​6​1​7​3
​
​
​
ef.pdf [Last accessed on 29 Apr 2026].
​
​
​
78. Mechler, R.; Deubelli, T. M. Finance for Loss and Damage: a comprehensive risk analytical approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.
2021, 50, 185-96. DOI
79. Mechler, R.; Calliari, E.; Bouwer, L. M.; et al. Science for loss and damage. Findings and propositions. In: Mechler R, Bouwer LM,
Schinko T, Surminski S, Linnerooth-Bayer J, editors. Loss and damage from climate change. Cham: Springer International Publishing;
2018. pp. 3-37. DOI
80. Wunder, S. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 117, 234-43. DOI
81. Börner, J.; Baylis, K.; Corbera, E.; et al. The effectiveness of payments for environmental services. World. Dev. 2017, 96, 359-74. DOI
82. Ramachandran Nair P, Nair VD, Mohan Kumar B, Showalter JM. Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Elsevier; 2010. pp.
237-307. DOI
83. Shi, L.; Feng, W.; Xu, J.; Kuzyakov, Y. Agroforestry systems: meta‐analysis of soil carbon stocks, sequestration processes, and future
potentials. Land. Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 3886-97. DOI
84. Celentano, D.; Rousseau, G. X.; Paixão, L. S.; et al. Carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling in agroforestry systems on degraded soils
of Eastern Amazon, Brazil. Agrofor. Syst. 2020, 94, 1781-92. DOI
85. Marques, J. D.; Dias, V. H. R.; Gomes, M. F.; et al. Soil quality in an agroforestry system in the scenario of family farming in the eastern
Amazon. Agrofor. Syst. 2025, 99, 174. DOI
86. Poeplau, C.; Don, A. Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops - A meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
2015, 200, 33-41. DOI
87. Jian, J.; Du, X.; Reiter, M. S.; Stewart, R. D. A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping. Soil. Biol.
Biochem. 2020, 143, 107735. DOI
88. De Stefano, A.; Jacobson, M. G. Soil carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems: a meta-analysis. Agrofor. Syst. 2017, 147, 285-99.
DOI
89. Lorenz, K.; Lal, R. Soil organic carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 34, 443-54. DOI
90. De Oliveira, D. C.; Maia, S. M. F.; Freitas, R. D. C. A.; Cerri, C. E. P. Changes in soil carbon and soil carbon sequestration potential
under different types of pasture management in Brazil. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2022, 22, 87. DOI
91. Brazil. Lei nº 14.119, de 13 de janeiro de 2021: institui a política nacional de pagamento por serviços ambientais e cria o programa
federal de pagamento por serviços ambientais. 2021. Available from: h​t​t​p​s​:​/​/​w​w​w​.​p​l​a​n​a​l​t​o​.​g​o​v​.​b​r​/​c​c​i​v​i​l​_​0​3​/​_​a​t​o​2​0​1​9​-​2​0​2​2​/​2​0​2​1​/​l​e​i​/​l​1​4
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
119.htm [Last accessed on 29 Apr 2026] (in Portuguese).
92. Ministério do Meio Ambiente e Mudança do Clima (MMA). Floresta+ Amazônia: pagamentos por serviços ambientais para conservação
e recuperação da vegetação nativa na Amazônia legal; Brasília, DF, Brazil, 2023. Available from: h​t​t​p​s​:​/​/​f​l​o​r​e​s​t​a​m​a​i​s​a​m​a​z​o​n​i​a​.​m​m​a​.​g​o​v
​
.br [Last accessed on 29 Apr 2026] (in Portuguese).
​
​
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and
contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of OAE and/or the editor(s). OAE and/or the editor(s) disclaim any responsibility for harm to
persons or property resulting from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products mentioned in the content.
© The Author(s) 2026. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and
reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and
the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.