Page 33 - Read Online
P. 33

Page 984                                                  Lee et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2020;3:980-91  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2020.73





















               Figure 1. Sensitivity of TNBC cell lines to CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib. IC 50  values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
               TNBC: triple negative breast cancer


               Tumor volumes were calculated using the formula V = (L × W × W)/2, where V is volume, L is length, and
               W is width. Body weights were analyzed twice weekly, and animals were observed for signs of distress or
               pain and sacrificed when appropriate.

               Statistical analysis
               Mean IC  values ± standard error of the mean (SEM) were determined from at least three biological
                       50
               replicates. Tumor volumes, tumor weights, and body weights are presented as mean ± SEM. All values were
               evaluated with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and means were compared with Dunnett’s post hoc
               test or Tukey’s post hoc test. Statistical significance was defined by *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.


               RESULTS
               Sensitivity of TNBC cell lines to prexasertib
               We first examined the sensitivity of a panel of TNBC cell lines to prexasertib [Figure 1]. Prexasertib
               effectively induced cell death at nanomolar concentrations for most TNBC cell lines, including BRCA mutated
               HCC1937 and MX-1 [Figure 1 and Table 1]. The highest sensitivity to prexasertib was observed in MX-1
               cells (orange line, IC , 5.7 nmol/L), while MDA-468 cells were highly resistant (blue line, IC , 105 nmol/L).
                                50
                                                                                             50
               Immunoblot analysis of the BRAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway in the TNBC cell lines showed mixed
               activation of this pathway in the prexasertib-sensitive cell lines [Figure 2]. In contrast, MDA-468 showed
               high activation of this pathway, similar to the prexasertib-resistant rhabdomyosarcoma xenograft . MDA-468
                                                                                               [8]
               also contained the highest expression level of EGFR. We examined AKT activation in the TNBC cell line
               panel and observed high activation of AKT in the MDA-468 and MX-1 cell lines. The activation of other
               DDR proteins in these cell lines is shown in Supplementary Figure 1.


               EGF stimulation increased resistance to prexasertib in MDA-231 cells
               Given the overexpression of EGFR in the MDA-468 cell line and the BRAF/MEK/ERK pathway stimulation,
               we examined whether stimulation by EGF would reduce the sensitivity of MDA-231 to prexasertib
               [Figure 3]. The MDA-231 cell line was selected because it has intermediate EGFR expression and
               sensitivity to prexasertib [Figures 1 and 2]. Stimulation of the MDA-231 cells with both 50 and 500 nmol/L
               EGF increased resistance to prexasertib with the IC  shifting from 17 to 61 nmol/L [Figure 3]. No change
                                                           50
               was observed when MDA-468 was stimulated with 50 nmol/L EGF, although a significant increase in cell
               viability was observed with 500 nmol/L EGF alone.
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38