Page 36 - Read Online
P. 36

Soren et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2020;3:18-25  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2019.106                                                          Page 23
                                                                                [49]
                                                                [48]
               the -1 position of the scissile strand for binding of CPT . Chrencik et al.  suggested that six residues
               (Phe361, Gly363, Arg364, Glu418, Gly503, and Asp533) present in the Lip1-Lip2 region harbor a CPT
                                      [49]
               resistant mutations cluster . Other studies on the Gly363 mutation show the role of this residue in CPT
               sensitivity [50,51] . Even though the linker domain is located far away from the active site of Tyr723, it can
               deeply affect the drug resistance or sensitivity of hTopIB. The main reason for this long-distance interaction
               is its flexibility. Evidence of these phenomena comes from several works where key residues involved in the
               mobility of the domain were mutated. The mutation of Ala653Pro has demonstrated that a large flexibility
                                                               [52]
               of the linker domain is associated to CPT resistance . This correlation has been shown also in the
                                 [30]
               Glu710Gly mutation . This paper demonstrated that a lower degree of linker motion leads to an increase
               of religation rate and consequently to CPT resistance. On the other hand, in the case of Asp677Gly-
                                                                                                  [53]
               Val703Ile double mutant, the reduction of the linker flexibility confers a hypersensitivity to CPT . Other
               evidence of linker involvement in enzyme religation rate comes from the construction of a chimeric
               enzyme, in which the human enzyme contains a linker from Plasmodium falciparum TopI (PfTopI). In the
               chimeric enzyme, the PfTopI linker shows a great flexibility and confers the chimeric enzyme to be CPT
                      [54]
               resistant . Moreover, inserting a long yeast linker domain in hTopIB drastically altered enzyme function in
               vivo. Expression of this chimera was toxic in yeast even in the absence of CPT, with no particular changes
                                [55]
               in enzyme catalysis . Altering the linker structure, either through changing its flexibility by the mutation
               of specific residues or by deleting the entire domain, affects the enzyme rate and consequently the CPT
               reactivity. An additional residue that was shown to impact CPT reactivity is Thr729, which is part of the
                                                                          [56]
               hydrophobic pocket present in the C-terminal domain. Losasso et al.  studied this residue extensively by
               producing different mutations, namely Thr729Ala, Thr729Glu, Thr729Lys, and Thr729Pro, and showed the
                                                                                         [56]
               importance of this residue in modulation of hTopIB DNA binding and drug resistance . Residue Asn722,
               which is present near the Thr729 residue, was also shown to impart CPT resistance to the protein [57,58] .

               CONCLUSION
               HTopIB is still a fascinating enzyme that is worth studying. However, some considerations should be given
               to try to focus the attention of the scientific community. Many inhibitors of the binding and cleavage phases
               have never entered into clinical protocols. The most important step for inhibition remains the religation
               and compounds that reversibly inhibit this phase of the enzyme catalysis. The only derivatives of CPT that
               are now in clinical use targeting hTopIB are still Topotecan and Irinotecan. It is probably time to look for
               other natural compounds that could inhibit this enzyme. Our group is focusing on a metabolite from an
               Antarctic sponge that was found to be a potent inhibitor of hTopIB (unpublished results). Perhaps it is time
               to study and search different ecosystems to obtain promising drugs for cancer therapy, as sometimes it is
               from nature that we have the best solution.

               DECLARATIONS

               Acknowledgments
               We thank Prof. A. Desideri and Dr. B. Morozzo Della Rocca for proof reading of the review.


               Authors’ contributions
               Wrote the review: Soren BC, Dasari JB
               Made all the pictures together with the writing part: Ottaviani A, Iacovelli F
               Supervised both parts graphic and writing part: Fiorani P

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41