Page 90 - Read Online
P. 90

Page 16 of 20                                                 Choi et al. Cancer Drug Resist. 2026;9:12





               transport toward mLVs. Second, injection volume had a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on contraction
               frequency; volumes of 4, 10, and 20 μL showed progressively reduced activity, with 20 μL producing the
               lowest frequency. Excessive volume may elevate intraluminal pressure or shear stress, triggering negative
               feedback mechanisms that suppress lymphatic contractions and potentially diverting tracer flow toward
               low-resistance pathways. Thus, minimizing injection volume to the effective threshold is essential for
               experimental consistency. Third, removal of skin and the resulting loss of external mechanical support
               significantly impaired lymphatic contraction. As contraction frequency decreased following skin removal,
               the authors suggested that external confinement contributes to maintaining physiological lymphatic
               pumping. Moreover, anesthesia has been shown to adversely affect glymphatic function and reduce transport
               toward the mLV , underscoring the need for protocols that incorporate adequate wake periods or
                              [81]
               standardized anesthetic depth. Collectively, these observations highlight the importance of methodological
               consistency, transparent reporting, and careful control of experimental variables in studies evaluating
               glymphatic and lymphatic transport.


               Despite these advances, several limitations remain. Most studies have been conducted in rodents with
               normal brain physiology, and the extent to which tumor-associated abnormalities - elevated interstitial
               pressure, vessel immaturity, heterogeneous extracellular matrix, or altered AQP4 localization - modulate US
               responsiveness is not yet known. Moreover, current findings on molecular-size dependence suggest that
               while US can enhance delivery of small agents via glymphatic pathways, the transport of large biological
               therapeutics may require additional strategies or optimized modulation paradigms.


               Looking forward, the convergence of US neuromodulation, lymphatic biology, and intrathecal drug delivery
               opens several compelling research directions. Future work is needed to define optimal US parameters for
               tumor-bearing brains, evaluate therapeutic distribution under pathological glymphatic impairment, and
               determine how localized vs. global glymphatic modulation influences tumor microenvironments. Clinical
               translation will further require systematic evaluation of safety, repeatability, and long-term effects,
               particularly as US-based BBB opening technologies are already being tested in patients.


               CONCLUSION
               The growing body of research on the glymphatic system has fundamentally reshaped our understanding of
               how the brain regulates fluid transport, metabolic waste removal, and therapeutic distribution. Although
               glymphatic dysfunction has been extensively examined in neurodegenerative diseases, its role in brain
               cancers - and its relevance to drug delivery - has remained comparatively underexplored. This review
               synthesizes emerging evidence showing that US, across a range of frequencies and exposure conditions, can
               actively augment glymphatic influx, enhance CSF–ISF exchange, and accelerate interstitial solute clearance.
               These effects collectively highlight US as a promising tool for overcoming key barriers to therapeutic
               penetration in brain tumors.


               Across the studies reviewed here, US was shown to modulate glymphatic transport through complementary
               biophysical and molecular mechanisms: amplification of perivascular pulsatility, vessel wall micron-scale
               deformation, TRPV4–CaM–AQP4–mediated fluid regulation, and microbubble-enhanced perivascular
               streaming. Importantly, these effects were demonstrated using diverse imaging modalities - including MRI,
               optical clearing–based 3D microscopy, and real-time two-photon imaging - providing converging evidence
               that US can influence multiple stages of glymphatic flow, from periarterial influx to parenchymal transport
               and perivenous efflux.


               Overall, the studies reviewed here suggest that US has the potential to reshape therapeutic strategies for brain
               tumors by unlocking an underutilized fluid pathway - the glymphatic system - for targeted drug delivery. By


                                                           83
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95