Page 48 - Read Online
P. 48

Page 136                                                  Villavisanis et al. Art Int Surg. 2025;5:133-38  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2024.89

               POSTOPERATIVE MONITORING
               Much of the discussion and research centered on artificial intelligence and machine learning in
               microvascular reconstructive surgery has been dedicated to postoperative flap monitoring, given the
               importance of early identification of postoperative complications and timely return to the operating
                    [32]
               room .

               A recent study in the JAMA network described the development of a cellphone-based application for
                                              [33]
               postoperative free flap monitoring . The authors leveraged artificial intelligence to develop models
               sensitive to venous and arterial insufficiency, based on over 11,000 unique clinical photos . The models
                                                                                             [33]
               were 97.5% sensitive in recognizing arterial insufficiency and 92.8% sensitive in recognizing venous
               insufficiency based on clinical photographs alone (Kim et al. 2024). Such models may aid clinicians in the
               early identification of flap failure and may be especially useful in regions, or units, typically naïve to
                                         [33]
               postoperative flap monitoring . This particular initiative may also encourage postoperative monitoring
               with clinical photographs at regular postoperative intervals, which may allow clinicians to remotely monitor
               free-flap postoperative progression .
                                            [33]

               Other groups have applied artificial intelligence methods to large datasets to analyze postoperative risk
               factors for flap failure . Colleagues in Toronto conducted a clinical study of over one thousand patients
                                  [34]
               undergoing microvascular free flap breast reconstruction. Among the twelve patients who experienced flap
               failure, the authors identified significant predictors including obesity and smoking . While these risk
                                                                                         [34]
               factors have been previously described, the application of artificial intelligence to large datasets may aid
               clinicians in predicting more nuanced outcomes for patient cohorts undergoing a diverse range of free flap
               reconstruction. As additional data or images are accrued, artificial intelligence can be trained and
               broadened to more accurately calculate risk or outcome occurrences.


               FUTURE APPLICATIONS
               Future endeavors should aim to build upon previously established work to expand the depth, breadth, and
               accuracy of applications. This may involve the application of artificial intelligence to preoperative flap
               imaging. With a predictive model, clinicians could envision artificial intelligence predicting and selecting
               the most viable vascular perforators for a reconstructive flap; however, this type of data should be leveraged
               in the context of patient-specific anatomy and surgeon experience. Intraoperatively, additional opportunity
               exists for refining artificial intelligence-generated support of intraoperative decision making, which may be
               especially useful in lower-resource settings or single-provider practice models. Augmented reality driven by
               artificial intelligence could augment surgical dissection in a real-time manner to help identify critical
               structures, vascular anatomy, or hazardous surgical maneuvers. Finally, postoperative monitoring may be
               supported by systems leveraging artificial intelligence to aid in automating flap monitoring to generate
               additional real-time data that may reduce the time from flap complication identification to return to the
               operating room.


               CONCLUSIONS
               Artificial intelligence has had an undeniable impact on clinical medicine and surgery; within microvascular
               free flap reconstruction, artificial intelligence continues to impact patient selection and prediction of
               preoperative outcomes, intraoperative assessment, and postoperative monitoring. While artificial
               intelligence will augment our ability to plan, implement, and monitor free flap reconstruction for our
               patients, clinicians and surgeons should continue to rely on in-person physical examination to corroborate
               data from emerging technology to yield the most optimal clinical outcomes. Based on the potential impact
               and implications of this work to patients and clinicians alike, we believe future research in this arena to be a
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53