Page 41 - Read Online
P. 41

Yoseph et al. Art Int Surg 2024;4:267-77  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2024.38                                                        Page 277

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Informed consent was gathered from each participant and this study was approved by the Stanford
               University Institutional Review Board (IRB-eProtocol #73097).


               Consent for publication
               Not Applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2024.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Rhee JM, Ju KL. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2016;6:e37.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               2.       Gould H, Sohail OA, Haines CM. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: techniques, complications, and future directives. Semin
                   Spine Surg 2020;32:100772.  DOI
               3.       Gaudin D, Krafcik BM, Mansour TR, Alnemari A. Considerations in spinal fusion surgery for chronic lumbar pain: psychosocial
                   factors, rating scales, and perioperative patient education - a review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2017;98:21-7.  DOI  PubMed
               4.       Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 2001;16:671-92.
                   DOI  PubMed
               5.       Langford AT, Roberts T, Gupta J, Orellana KT, Loeb S. Impact of the Internet on patient-physician communication. Eur Urol Focus
                   2020;6:440-4.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Thirunavukarasu AJ, Ting DSJ, Elangovan K, Gutierrez L, Tan TF, Ting DSW. Large language models in medicine. Nat Med
                   2023;29:1930-40.  DOI  PubMed
               7.       Hung YC, Chaker SC, Sigel M, Saad M, Slater ED. Comparison of patient education materials generated by chat generative pre-
                   trained transformer versus experts: an innovative way to increase readability of patient education materials. Ann Plast Surg
                   2023;91:409-12.  DOI  PubMed
               8.       Lang SP, Yoseph ET, Gonzalez-Suarez AD, et al. Analyzing large language models’ responses to common lumbar spine fusion
                   surgery questions: a comparison between ChatGPT and Bard. Neurospine 2024;21:633-41.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               9.       Blease C, Bernstein MH, Gaab J, et al. Computerization and the future of primary care: a survey of general practitioners in the UK.
                   PLoS One 2018;13:e0207418.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               10.      Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.  PubMed
               11.      Goodman RS, Patrinely JR, Stone CA Jr, et al. Accuracy and reliability of chatbot responses to physician questions. JAMA Netw Open
                   2023;6:e2336483.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               12.      Subramanian T, Shahi P, Araghi K, et al. Using artificial intelligence to answer common patient-focused questions in minimally
                   invasive spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023;105:1649-53.  DOI  PubMed
               13.      Mika AP, Martin JR, Engstrom SM, Polkowski GG, Wilson JM. Assessing ChatGPT responses to common patient questions regarding
                   total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023;105:1519-26.  DOI  PubMed
               14.      Jahanshahi H, Kazmi S, Cevik M. Auto response generation in online medical chat services. J Healthc Inform Res 2022;6:344-74.
                   DOI  PubMed  PMC
               15.      Aggarwal A, Tam CC, Wu D, Li X, Qiao S. Artificial intelligence-based chatbots for promoting health behavioral changes: systematic
                   review. J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e40789.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               16.      Bharti U, Bajaj D, Batra H, Lalit S, Lalit S, Gangwani A. Medbot: conversational artificial intelligence powered chatbot for delivering
                   tele-health after COVID-19. In: 2020 5th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES); 2020 Jun 10-
                   12; Coimbatore, India. IEEE; 2020. pp. 870-5.  DOI
               17.      Laranjo L, Dunn AG, Tong HL, et al. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018;25:1248-
                   58.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               18.      OpenAI. GPT-4. Available from: https://openai.com/gpt-4. [Last accessed on 27 Sep 2024].
               19.      OpenAI. GPT-4 Research. Available from: https://openai.com/index/gpt-4-research/. [Last accessed on 27 Sep 2024].
               20.      Brin D, Sorin V, Vaid A, et al. Comparing ChatGPT and GPT-4 performance in USMLE soft skill assessments. Sci Rep
                   2023;13:16492.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               21.      Sharma A, Schauer DP, Kelleher M, Kinnear B, Sall D, Warm E. USMLE step 2 CK: best predictor of multimodal performance in an
                   internal medicine residency. J Grad Med Educ 2019;11:412-9.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               22.      Ayers JW, Poliak A, Dredze M, et al. Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a
                   public social media forum. JAMA Intern Med 2023;183:589-96.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               23.      Ali R, Connolly ID, Tang OY, et al. Bridging the literacy gap for surgical consents: an AI-human expert collaborative approach. NPJ
                   Digit Med 2024;7:63.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               24.      Emsley R. ChatGPT: these are not hallucinations - they’re fabrications and falsifications. Schizophrenia 2023;9:52.  DOI  PubMed
                   PMC
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46