Page 40 - Read Online
P. 40

Page 276                                                         Yoseph et al. Art Int Surg 2024;4:267-77  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2024.38

               While our study provides valuable insights, it also raises several important research questions that warrant
               further exploration. Future studies could investigate how LLMs perform across various medical specialties
               and how they manage more complex or sensitive patient inquiries. Understanding the impact of LLM-
               generated responses on patient decision making is another exciting area for future research. There is also
               great potential in determining how a combined model that integrates LLMs with physician oversight
               changes the surgical decision-making process, potentially in terms of increasing or decreasing the number
               of patients who opt for surgical intervention, and/or improving their comfort level and understanding of the
               risks/benefits.

               One final exciting application of AI in surgery is its significant role in enhancing the surgical consent
               process in spinal surgery. Recent studies have demonstrated that AI can effectively simplify complex
               medical information, improving readability and comprehension for patients. For example, Ali et al. showed
               that ChatGPT-4.0 could generate procedure-specific consent forms at an average 6th-grade reading level,
                                                                                                [23]
               significantly enhancing patient understanding without sacrificing important medical details . This AI-
               human expert collaborative approach not only improves patient education but also addresses medico-legal
               concerns by ensuring that consent forms meet both medical and legal standards. Given the litigious nature
               of spinal surgery, it is critical for future work to address the medico-legal implications of incorporating AI
               into this field. LLMs can still produce errors or “hallucinations”, making it essential to implement strict
                                                                                                 [24]
               validation processes to ensure that only the most accurate information is conveyed to patients . This is
               particularly important as AI-generated content becomes more integrated into surgical decision making,
               where the stakes are highest.

               Notably, ChatGPT provided the following statement after answering the last question: “Always consult with
               your spine surgeon for personalized advice and to address specific concerns regarding your ACDF surgery”.
               As LLMs evolve and enhance their precision, clarity, and comprehensiveness, it is important for physicians
               and medical researchers to evaluate and study the best way to incorporate these tools into the routine care
               of our patients moving forward.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study: Yoseph ET, Lang S, Zygourakis
               CC
               Performed data analysis and interpretation: Yoseph ET, Gonzalez-Suarez AD
               Supported data acquisition: Yoseph ET, Zygourakis CC, Hu SS, Desai A
               Wrote the manuscript: Yoseph ET, Gonzalez-Suarez AD, Zygourakis CC
               Critically revised and approved final manuscript: Yoseph ET, Gonzalez-Suarez AD, Lang S, Desai A, Hu SS,
               Zygourakis CC


               Availability of data and materials
               Data supporting the findings of this study are available in Supplementary Tables.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               Zygourakis CC is a consultant for Stryker and Amgen; Desai A is a consultant for Stryker and Carlsmed.
               While the other authors have declared that they have no conflicts of interest.
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45