Page 96 - Read Online
P. 96

Page 10 of 13          Liu et al. Microstructures 2023;3:2023008  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2022.31
































                       Figure 7. (A and B) U , (C and D) η, (E and F) U  and η at each E Max  of monolayer and trilayer nanocomposites.
                                      dis
                                                        dis
               14.43 J/cm  (49.34%), 13.61 J/cm  (49.34%), and 13.01 J/cm  (48.98%), respectively. Figure 7F reveals that the
                                                                3
                                          3
                        3
               U  and η of the 0-2-0 sample are 17.37 J/cm  and 52.93%, respectively, at 580 kV/mm, which are 90.5% and
                                                     3
                 dis
                                                       3
               7.2% more than those of pure PVDF (9.12 J/cm  and 45.72% at 450 kV/mm).
               To better characterize the uniform stability of the 0-2-0 sample, the average values of U  and η of the 0-2-0
                                                                                         dis
               sample in several places with varying electric fields were measured, as shown in Figure 8A and B. The
               variation patterns of U  and η for the electric field were consistent, as shown in Figure 7. In addition, the
                                   dis
               radar chart emphasized the overall performance of the 0-2-0 sample. The larger the area of the radar chart,
               the better the overall performance of the nanocomposites. The five parameters of U , η, β, ε, and E  of pure
                                                                                                   b
                                                                                      dis
               PVDF, 2 wt% monolayer BNT-BST/PVDF nanocomposites, and the symmetric trilayer 0-2-0 sample are
               compared in Figure 8C. The results show that the area encompassed by the 0-2-0 sample is the largest,
               indicating that the 0-2-0 sample has superior performance in all respects. Finally, the overdamped discharge
               curve of the 0-2-0 sample in various electric fields was examined using a dielectric material charge
               measurement system with a resistance of 10 kΩ [Figure 8D and E]. The peak current reached 0.505 A for
               0.228 μs. Figure 8F shows that the pulse discharge energy density (W ) of the 0-2-0 sample is 5.30 J/cm  at
                                                                                                       3
                                                                          d
               400 kV/mm and 10 μs compared with 3.10 J/cm for pure PVDF.
                                                       3
               CONCLUSIONS
               In conclusion, BNT-BST nanofibers with high aspect ratios were prepared using the electrospinning
               method. Monolayer and symmetric trilayer PVDF-based nanocomposites with varied BNT-BST nanofiber
               loadings were prepared using the solution-casting method. It was proved that trilayer nanocomposites are
               more effective than monolayer nanocomposites at enhancing the energy storage performance of dielectric
               nanocomposites. The reason is that a pure PVDF layer with excellent insulating properties helps prevent
               charge injection and current leakage by inhibiting the development of electrical trees. Therefore, a high
               energy density of 17.37 J/cm and an efficiency of 52.93% are simultaneously achieved in the optimized 0-2-0
                                       3
               sample. We believe that the trilayer design strategy is crucial for investigating dielectric capacitors with high
               energy density.
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101