Page 129 - Read Online
P. 129

Paraggio et al. Vessel Plus 2019;3:12  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2018.72                                               Page 11 of 11

                   percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. J Am Coll Cardiol
                   2001;38:409-14.
               5.   Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Toma A, Elhadj Z, Laroussi L, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions in patients
                   with low left ventricular ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:2158-70.
               6.   Jang WJ, Yang JH, Choi SH, Song YB, Hahn JY, et al. Long-term survival benefit of revascularization compared with medical therapy
                   in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion and well-developed collateral circulation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:271-9.
               7.   Henriques JP, Hoebers LP, Ramunddal T, Laanmets P, Eriksen E, et al. Percutaneous intervention for concurrent chronic total occlusions
                   in patients with STEMI: the EXPLORE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:1622-32.
               8.   Mashayekhi K, Nührenberg TG, Toma A, Gick M, Ferenc M, et al. A randomized trial to assess regional left ventricular function after
                   stent implantation in chronic total occlusion: the REVASC trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:1982-91.
               9.   Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, Boudou N, Sianos G, et al. A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization
                   with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J 2018;39:2484-93.
               10.  Walsh S on the behalf of Consistent CTO Investigators. CONventional antegrade vs. Sub-Intimal SYNERGY sTENTing in Chronic
                   Total Occlusions. EuroPCR 2018. Available from: https://www.pcronline.com/Cases-resources-images/Resources/Course-videos-
                   slides/2018/Hotline-coronary-interventions. [Last accessed on 10 Apr 2019]
               11.  Galassi AR, Tomasello SD, Reifart N, Werner GS, Sianos G, et al. In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention
                   in patients with chronic total occlusion: insights from the ERCTO (European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion) registry.
                   EuroIntervention 2011;7:472-9.
               12.  Thompson CA, Jayne JE, Robb JF, Friedman BJ, Kaplan AV, et al. Retrograde techniques and the impact of operator volume on
                   percutaneous intervention for coronary chronic total occlusions an early U.S. experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:834-42.
               13.  Wilson WM, Walsh SJ, Yan AT, Hanratty CG, Bagnall AJ, et al. Hybrid approach improves success of chronic total occlusion
                   angioplasty. Heart 2016;102:1486-93.
               14.  Maeremans J, Spratt JC, Knaapen P, Walsh S, Agostoni P, et al. Towards a contemporary, comprehensive scoring system for determining
                   technical outcomes of hybrid percutaneous chronic total occlusion treatment: The RECHARGE score. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
                   2018;91:192-202.
               15.  Christopoulos G, Kandzari DE, Yeh RW, Jaffer FA, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Development and validation of a novel scoring system for
                   predicting technical success of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions: The PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global
                   Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) Score. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:1-9.
               16.  Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, Kennedy JW, Kereiakes D, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines of percutaneous coronary interventions
                   (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary. A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association
                   task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). J Am
                   Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:2215-39.
               17.  Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, Kimura T, Hayashi Y, et al. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion
                   of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time
                   assessment tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:213-21.
               18.  Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in
                   patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377:1409-20.
               19.  Burzotta F, Trani C, Tommasino A, Giammarinaro M, De Vita M, et al. Radial approach for CTO lesions: acute, long term results and
                   impact of learning curve. EuroInteventions 2011;7:260
               20.  Mamas MA, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser DG. Distal stent delivery with GuideLiner catheter: first in man experience. Catheter Cardiovasc
                   Interv 2010;76:102-11.
               21.  Fujita S, Tamai H, Kyo E, Kosuga K, Hata T, et al. New technique for superior guiding catheter support during advancement of a
                   balloon in coronary angioplasty: the anchor technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:482-8.
               22.  Ali M, Yagoub H, Ibrahim A, Ahmed M, Ibrahim M, et al. Anchor-balloon technique to facilitate stent delivery via the GuideLiner
                   cathter in percutaneous coronary interventions. Future Cardiol 2018;14:291-9.
               23.  Oreglia JA, Garbo R, Gagnor A, Gasparini GL. Dual lumen microcatheters for complex percutaneous coronary interventions.
                   Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2018;19:298-305.
               24.  Patel SM, Pokala NR, Menon RV, Kotsia AP, Raja V, et al. Prevalence and treatment of “balloon-uncrossable” coronary chronic total
                   occlusions. J Invasive Cardiol 2015;27:78-84.
               25.  Brinton TJ. Lithoplasty for treatment of calcified coronary disease the results of the DISRUPT CAD study. EuroPCR 2017.
               26.  Picano E, Vano E, Rehani MM, Cuocolo A, Mont L, et al. The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular
                   imaging: A position document of the ESC associations of cardiovascular imaging, percutaneous cardiovascular interventions and
                   electrophysiology. Eur Heart J 2014;35:665-72.
               27.  Brilakis ES, Banerjee S, Karmpaliotis D, Lombardi WL, Tsai TT, et al. Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous
                   coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:245-53.
               28.  Giannini F, Candilio L, Mitomo S, Ruparelia N, Chieffo A, et al. A practical approach to the management of complications during
                   percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:1797-810.
               29.  Stankovic G, Orlic D, Corvaja N, Airoldi F, Chieffo A, et al. Incidence, predictors, in-hospital, and late outcomes of coronary artery
                   perforations. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:213-6.
               30.  Ellis SG, Ajluni S, Arnold AZ, Popma JJ, Bittl JA, et al. Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification,
                   management, and outcome. Circulation 1994;90:2725-30.
               31.  Garbo R, Oreglia JA, Gasparini GL. The Balloon-Microcatheter technique for treatment of coronary artery perforations. Catheter
                   Cardiovasc Interv 2017;89:E75-83.
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134