Page 65 - Read Online
P. 65

Dokko et al. Vessel Plus 2022;6:37  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2021.121  Page 11 of 21

               in the nitric oxide signaling pathway, which has influences on myocardial ion currents, such as the
               potassium  current.  Wnt  signaling  may  promote  cardiac  fibrosis,  which  can  also  contribute  to
                         [116]
               arrhythmias .

                                                                           [117]
               Although POAF may be common, it may be a transient condition . The transient nature of POAF
               suggests surgical techniques or approaches may be related to the development of this potentially temporary
               post-procedural complication. For example, POAF occurs at similar frequencies following transcatheter MV
               (MitraClip) procedures , as it does following transcatheter ablation for AF itself , POAF may be related
                                                                                    [119]
                                   [118]
               to fluid shifts, oxidative stress, inflammation, catecholamine release, and altered sympathetic and
               parasympathetic activity during cardiac surgery [120,121] . Additionally, direct injury to the atria either from
               manipulation or incision during surgery may disrupt electrical conduction . This may contribute to
                                                                                  [120]
               refractoriness and the formation of reentry wavelets. However, minimizing cardiac manipulation using an
               off-pump technique did not lead to a POAF post-CABG decrease .
                                                                      [103]

               POAF is a complex and multifactorial condition. Development of POAF likely depends on both pre-
               operative patient-specific factors, such as LA size and genetic alterations, and factors related to surgery.
               Understanding the etiology and predictors of POAF development is essential for risk stratification and
               treatment decisions in patients undergoing MV repair or replacement. While some risk factors predisposing
               to new-onset POAF have been identified for specific cardiac surgery populations, there is a paucity of data
               regarding the longer-term impact on MV patients. Future research will be necessary to evaluate the role of
               these patient risk characteristics vs. the role of surgery-specific factors, such as surgical “low touch” (i.e.,
               reduced manipulation) techniques. Furthermore, to date very little is known about pharmacologic
               prophylaxis in this patient population.


               Incidence
               New-onset POAF is especially common after MV procedures compared to other cardiac procedures .
                                                                                                       [8,9]
               New-onset POAF has been seen in 24% of patients after surgery for mitral regurgitation  and in 39% of
                                                                                            [7]
               patients after surgery for mitral stenosis . Overall, the incidence of new-onset POAF in patients undergoing
                                                [8]
                                               [5,6]
               MV procedures is between 14%-42% , with approximately 23% of patients developing new-onset POAF
               after MV replacement and 15% after MV repair , In patients with transcatheter MV repair using MitraClip,
                                                       [5]
               the incidence of new-onset POAF was very rare with one study reporting 1.5% .
                                                                                 [122]
               Prophylaxis
               Prophylactic management of new-onset POAF for patients undergoing MV surgery is primarily through
               medical therapy as recommended by the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines on the management of atrial
               fibrillation (Class IIa, Level A; Class IIb, Level B). Under these guidelines, amiodarone (Class IIa, Level A)
               may be recommended prior to surgery or sotalol (Class IIb, Level B) post-surgery when patients are at high
               risk of POAF . A recent randomized control trial using one prophylactic dose of intravenous amiodarone
                          [37]
               and magnesium sulfate showed significant differences in post-cardiopulmonary bypass arrhythmia
               incidence in patients undergoing surgical MV replacement. This study population included patients with
               and without pre-operative atrial fibrillation. At discharge, 30% of patients treated with amiodarone and
               magnesium sulfate had atrial fibrillation, compared to 73.3% of patients who did not receive this
                          [123]
               intervention . This finding was in agreement with a previous study of the same framework but using only
               a single dose of amiodarone prior to valve replacement .
                                                             [124]
               As POAF may be in part due to post-surgical inflammation, anti-inflammatory therapies have been
               suggested as prophylaxis following cardiac surgery. Several meta-analyses found that prophylactic treatment
               with colchicine or dexamethasone decreased POAF after cardiac surgery [125,126] . However, evidence from
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70