Page 66 - Read Online
P. 66

Page 12 of 21                 Dokko et al. Vessel Plus 2022;6:37  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2021.121

               randomized control trials for the use of these anti-inflammatory treatments following MV surgery
               specifically is lacking.

               Currently, studies on prophylactic surgical or transcatheter ablation in MV surgery are few to none due to
               the uncertainty in benefits and risks of ablation in patients who present with sinus rhythm and the
               frequently transient nature of POAF [127,128] . Prophylactic surgical ablation has been reported for “high risk”
                                                                                [129]
               (e.g., rheumatic heart disease patients undergoing MV repair) procedures . As these high-risk patient
               populations are rarely found within the United States; however, this prophylactic approach to prevent atrial
               fibrillation is not commonplace. A recent study with a mean follow-up of 23 months has shown
               prophylactic maze surgical ablation to be effective in patients with congenital heart disease, resulting in
               reduced  burden  or  freedom  from  arrhythmias  without  early  or  late  mortality  but  not  without
                        [129]
               recurrence . Further research on how to optimize the prevention of new-onset POAF in high-risk patients
               undergoing specific surgery procedures (i.e., MV-related) is warranted. As of now, for patients with POAF
               that persists after either MV surgery or concomitant surgical ablation, transcatheter ablation is an option,
               and its outcomes are detailed in Section 2.4.2 [130,131] .

               Outcomes
               Surgical and transcatheter mitral valve procedures
               There is not a clear consensus on the impact of POAF on short- and long-term outcomes following MV
               procedures. One study with 361 MV surgery patients and median follow-up of 3.1 years demonstrated that
               POAF was an independent predictor of all-cause late mortality, defined as death beyond 30 days, but was
               not associated with increased early mortality. This group experienced significantly more in-hospital
                                                                                                [6]
               cerebrovascular events, which may have contributed to increased late mortality in these patients . Another
                                 [132]
               study by Doshi et al.  with 2580 transcatheter MV repair patients showed no significant differences in
               adjusted MACCE rates and in-hospital mortality for patients with and without POAF. However, patients
               with POAF had longer median lengths of stay and higher associated resource utilization costs, which they
               state may have been due to atrial fibrillation, older age and increased comorbidities in patients with
               POAF . Other studies have shown similar non-significant differences in mortality between patients with
                    [132]
               and without POAF after MV surgery, but show an increasing trend toward mortality or stroke and
               increased risk of recurrent myocardial infarction [5,7,111] . Table 3 lists several multivariate models for long-
               term morbidity and mortality in which POAF was model-eligible. Although more studies are needed on
               short-term outcomes, POAF generally appears to have a harmful impact on long-term MV outcomes.


               Additionally, the burden of pre-operative atrial fibrillation may be important as a predictor of short- and
               long-term outcomes in MV repair procedures. Persistent atrial fibrillation has been associated with higher
               mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure at 30 days compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, but
               showed similar 1-year outcomes . In a cohort study with a mean follow-up of 9 years, the risk of mortality
                                          [87]
               was greatest in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation compared to that of patients with paroxysmal atrial
               fibrillation and least in patients with sinus rhythm, regardless of age, sex and comorbidities . However, a
                                                                                              [2]
               more recent study of the Nationwide Readmission Database compared paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to non-
               paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and did not show any significant difference in death, stroke or 30-day
               readmission after transcatheter MV repair .
                                                  [54]

               Transcatheter ablation
               Although the optimal timing of transcatheter ablation after MV surgeries or surgical ablation is not yet
               clear, transcatheter ablation generally appears to be safe and effective after both procedures. Performed a
               median of 224 days [73.0; 424.8] after the original procedure, transcatheter ablation in patients with atrial
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71