Page 102 - Read Online

Page 18 of 18 Browne et al. Vessel Plus 2024;8:19 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.126

Nineteen years of training at a single institution. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;29:12-22. DOI
68. Guo LR, Chu MW, Tong MZ, et al. Does the trainee’s level of experience impact on patient safety and clinical outcomes in coronary
artery bypass surgery? J Card Surg 2008;23:1-5. DOI
69. Taggart DP, Gaudino MF, Gerry S, et al; ART investigators. Effect of total arterial grafting in the arterial revascularization trial. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;163:1002-9.e6. DOI
70. Gaudino M, Samadashvili Z, Hameed I, Chikwe J, Girardi LN, Hannan EL. Differences in long-term outcomes after coronary artery
bypass grafting using single vs multiple arterial grafts and the association with sex. JAMA Cardiol 2020;6:401-9. DOI PubMed PMC
71. Gaudino M, Alexander JH, Bakaeen FG, et al. Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts:
the ROMA trial-rationale and study protocol. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;52:1031-40. DOI
72. Gurevitch J, Kramer A, Locker C, et al. Technical aspects of double-skeletonized internal mammary artery grafting. Ann Thorac Surg
2000;69:841-6. DOI
73. Gaudino M, Cellini C, Pragliola C, et al. Arterial versus venous bypass grafts in patients with in-stent restenosis. Circulation
2005;112:I265-9. DOI
74. Goldman S, Sethi GK, Holman W, et al. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized
trial. JAMA 2011;305:167-74. DOI
75. Glineur D, D’hoore W, de Kerchove L, et al. Angiographic predictors of 3-year patency of bypass grafts implanted on the right
coronary artery system: a prospective randomized comparison of gastroepiploic artery, saphenous vein, and right internal thoracic
artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142:980-8. DOI
76. Mannacio VA, Di Tommaso L, Antignan A, De Amicis V, Vosa C. Aspirin plus clopidogrel for optimal platelet inhibition following
off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the CRYSSA (prevention of coronary arteRY bypaSS occlusion after off-pump
procedures) randomised study. Heart 2012;98:1710-5. DOI PubMed
77. Hattler B, Messenger JC, Shroyer AL, et al; Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. Off-pump coronary
artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: results
from the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. Circulation 2012;125:2827-35. DOI
78. Dreifaldt M, Mannion JD, Bodin L, Olsson H, Zagozdzon L, Souza D. The no-touch saphenous vein as the preferred second conduit
for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:105-11. DOI PubMed
79. Houlind K, Fenger-Grøn M, Holme SJ, et al; DOORS Study Group. Graft patency after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is
inferior even with identical heparinization protocols: results from the Danish on-pump versus off-pump randomization study
(DOORS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:1812-9.e2. DOI
80. Kim MS, Hwang HY, Kim JS, Oh SJ, Jang MJ, Kim KB. Saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery as a Y-composite graft:
Five-year angiographic and clinical results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;156:1424-33.e1. DOI