Page 101 - Read Online

Browne et al. Vessel Plus 2024;8:19 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.126 Page 17 of 18

and low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes in saphenous-vein coronary-artery bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 1997;336:153-63.
DOI PubMed
41. Saw J, Wong GC, Mayo J, et al. Ticagrelor and aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular events after coronary artery bypass graft
surgery. Heart 2016;102:763-9. DOI
42. Sandner S, Redfors B, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Association of dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor with vein graft failure after coronary
artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2022;328:554-62. DOI
43. Solo K, Lavi S, Kabali C, et al. Antithrombotic treatment after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: systematic review and network
meta-analysis. BMJ 2019;367:l5476. DOI PubMed PMC
44. Sun X, Huang J, Wang W, et al. Off-pump skeletonized versus pedicled left internal mammary artery grafting: mid-term results. J
Card Surg 2015;30:494-9. DOI
45. Mannacio V, Di Tommaso L, De Amicis V, Stassano P, Vosa C. Randomized flow capacity comparison of skeletonized and pedicled
left internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:24-30. DOI PubMed
46. Benedetto U, Altman DG, Gerry S, et al; Arterial Revascularization Trial investigators. Pedicled and skeletonized single and bilateral
internal thoracic artery grafts and the incidence of sternal wound complications: insights from the arterial revascularization trial. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;152:270-6. DOI
47. de Oliveira Sá MPB, Ferraz PE, Escobar RR, et al. Skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery and risk of sternal wound
infection after coronary bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 4817 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
2013;16:849-57. DOI PubMed PMC
48. Amano A, Takahashi A, Hirose H. Skeletonized radial artery grafting: improved angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1880-
7. DOI PubMed
49. Calafiore AM, Vitolla G, Iaco AL, et al. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: midterm results of pedicled versus skeletonized
conduits. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1637-42. DOI
50. Hirose H, Amano A, Takanashi S, Takahashi A. Skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery grafting for patients with diabetes.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2003;2:287-92. DOI PubMed
51. Kai M, Hanyu M, Soga Y, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic arteries in
insulin-dependent diabetics. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:32-6. DOI
52. Sazzad MF, Moniruzzaman M, Chanda PK, et al. Short term clinical and angiographic outcome of skeletonized harvesting technique
of left internal mammary artery, compared to pedicled harvesting for coronary revascularization. Univ Heart J 2016;12:82-7. DOI
53. Dimagli A, Soletti G Jr, Harik L, et al. Angiographic outcomes for arterial and venous conduits used in CABG. J Clin Med
2023;12:2022. DOI PubMed PMC
54. Dreifaldt M, Samano N, Geijer H, Lidén M, Bodin L, Souza D. Pedicled versus skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafts: a
randomized trial. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2021;29:490-7. DOI PubMed PMC
55. Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. The right internal thoracic artery: the forgotten conduit - 5,766 patients and 991 angiograms. Ann
Thorac Surg 2011;92:9-17. DOI PubMed
56. Glineur D, Hanet C, Poncelet A, et al. Comparison of bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization using in situ or Y graft
configurations: a prospective randomized clinical, functional, and angiographic midterm evaluation. Circulation 2008;118:S216-21.
DOI PubMed
57. Glineur D, Boodhwani M, Hanet C, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery configuration for coronary artery bypass surgery: a
prospective randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:e003518. DOI PubMed PMC
58. Calafiore AM, Contini M, Vitolla G, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term clinical and angiographic results of in
situ versus Y grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:990-6. DOI
59. Buttar SN, Yan TD, Taggart DP, Tian DH. Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting
versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis. Heart 2017;103:1419-26. DOI PubMed
60. Schwann TA, Habib RH, Wallace A, et al. Operative outcomes of multiple-arterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting. Ann
Thorac Surg 2018;105:1109-19. DOI
61. Thuijs DJFM, Head SJ, Stone GW, et al. Outcomes following surgical revascularization with single versus bilateral internal thoracic
arterial grafts in patients with left main coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the EXCEL
trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;55:501-10. DOI
62. Sabik JF 3rd, Mehaffey JH, Badhwar V, et al. Multiarterial vs single-arterial coronary surgery: 10-year follow-up of 1 million patients.
Ann Thorac Surg 2024;117:780-8. DOI
63. Thuijs DJFM, Davierwala P, Milojevic M, et al; SYNTAX Extended Survival Investigators. Long-term survival after coronary bypass
surgery with multiple versus single arterial grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;61:925-33. DOI PubMed PMC
64. Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, et al; ART Investigators. Randomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts.
N Engl J Med 2016;375:2540-9. DOI
65. Schwann TA, Habib RH, Wallace A, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery versus radial artery multi-arterial bypass grafting: a report
from the STS database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;56:926-34. DOI
66. Venardos N, Reece TB, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. Training for multiple arterial grafting: a thoracic surgery resident survey. Ann Thorac
Surg 2021;111:1901-7. DOI
67. Benedetto U, Caputo M, Gaudino M, et al. How safe is it to train residents to perform coronary surgery with multiple arterial grafting?