Page 100 - Read Online
P. 100

Page 16 of 18               Browne et al. Vessel Plus 2024;8:19  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.126

                   surgery: the aggressive cholesterol therapy to inhibit vein graft events randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
                   2019;157:151-61.e1.  DOI  PubMed
               15.      Kulik A, Le May MR, Voisine P, et al. Aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone after coronary artery bypass grafting: the
                   clopidogrel after surgery for coronary artery disease (CASCADE) trial. Circulation 2010;122:2680-7.  DOI
               16.      Zhao Q, Zhu Y, Xu Z, et al. Effect of ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor alone, or aspirin alone on saphenous vein graft patency 1 year
                   after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;319:1677-86.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               17.      Willemsen LM, Janssen PWA, Peper J, et al. Effect of adding ticagrelor to standard aspirin on saphenous vein graft patency in patients
                   undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (POPular CABG): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation
                   2020;142:1799-807.  DOI
               18.      Alexander JH, Hafley G, Harrington RA, et al; PREVENT IV Investigators. Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription
                   factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized
                   controlled trial. JAMA 2005;294:2446-54.  DOI
               19.      Kulik A, Abreu AM, Boronat V, Kouchoukos NT, Ruel M. Ticagrelor versus aspirin and vein graft patency after coronary bypass: a
                   randomized trial. J Card Surg 2022;37:563-70.  DOI
               20.      Buxton BF, Raman JS, Ruengsakulrach P, et al. Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized
                   trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1363-71.  DOI
               21.      Deb S, Cohen EA, Singh SK, Une D, Laupacis A, Fremes SE; RAPS Investigators. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more
                   than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:28-
                   35.  DOI
               22.      Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, Moat NE; Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Trial Investigators. Radial artery
                   versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation 2008;117:2859-64.  DOI
               23.      Petrovic I, Nezic D, Peric M, et al. Radial artery vs saphenous vein graft used as the second conduit for surgical myocardial
                   revascularization: long-term clinical follow-up. J Cardiothorac Surg 2015;10:127.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               24.      Nasso G, Coppola R, Bonifazi R, Piancone F, Bozzetti G, Speziale G. Arterial revascularization in primary coronary artery bypass
                   grafting: direct comparison of 4 strategies--results of the stand-in-Y mammary study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:1093-100.
                   DOI  PubMed
               25.      Song SW, Sul SY, Lee HJ, Yoo KJ. Comparison of the radial artery and saphenous vein as composite grafts in off-pump coronary
                   artery bypass grafting in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. Korean Circ J 2012;42:107-12.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               26.      Gaudino M, Bakaeen F, Benedetto U, et al. Use rate and outcome in bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: insights from a
                   systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e009361.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               27.      Deng MX, Lia H, Lee G, et al. Angiographic patency of coronary artery bypass conduits: an updated network meta-analysis of
                   randomized trials. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2022;37:7-31.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               28.      Yokoyama Y, Takagi H, Kuno T. Graft patency of a second conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of
                   randomized controlled trials. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;34:102-9.  DOI  PubMed
               29.      Gaudino M, Audisio K, Di Franco A, et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery for coronary artery
                   bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;62:ezac345.  DOI
               30.      Taggart DP, Benedetto U, Gerry S, et al; Arterial Revascularization Trial Investigators. Bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery
                   grafts at 10 years. N Engl J Med 2019;380:437-46.  DOI
               31.      Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al; CORONARY Investigators. Five-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-
                   artery bypass grafting. N Engl J Med 2016;375:2359-68.  DOI  PubMed
               32.      Hayward PA, Gordon IR, Hare DL, et al. Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein
                   beyond 5 years: results from the radial artery patency and clinical outcomes trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:60-7.  DOI
               33.      Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al; RADIAL Investigators. Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass
                   surgery. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2069-77.  DOI
               34.      Gaudino M, Lorusso R, Rahouma M, et al. Radial artery versus right internal thoracic artery versus saphenous vein as the second
                   conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e010839.  DOI
                   PubMed  PMC
               35.      de Oliveira Sá MPB, Ferraz PE, Escobar RR, et al. Patency of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery in coronary bypass
                   graft surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Int J Surg 2014;12:666-72.  DOI
               36.      Hayashi Y, Ito T, Maekawa A, et al. Effect of modified proximal anastomosis of the free right internal thoracic artery: piggyback and
                   foldback techniques. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016;22:265-72.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               37.      Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al; Veterans affairs randomized on/off bypass (ROOBY) study group. On-pump versus off-pump
                   coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1827-37.  DOI
               38.      Antonopoulos AS, Odutayo A, Oikonomou EK, et al; SAFINOUS-CABG (Saphenous Vein Graft Failure - An Outcomes Study in
                   Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) group. Development of a risk score for early saphenous vein graft failure: an individual patient data
                   meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;160:116-27.e4.  DOI
               39.      Tian M, Wang X, Sun H, et al. No-touch versus conventional vein harvesting techniques at 12 months after coronary artery bypass
                   grafting surgery: multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Circulation 2021;144:1120-9.  DOI
               40.      Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators. The effect of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105