Page 26 - Read Online
P. 26

Page 8 of 22                   Andò et al. Vessel Plus 2023;7:15  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.26

               advent of the stent era and the awareness that the residual plaque burden at the time of stent implantation
               was directly proportional to the degree of neointimal proliferation, the cause of intrastent restenosis, it was
               hypothesized that maximum mechanical debulking could reduce the risk of restenosis, increasing the
               minimum luminal diameter (MLD) obtained at the end of the procedure and limiting the degree of
               barotrauma to the vessel . Observational data confirmed the efficacy and safety of a pre-PTCA RA strategy
                                    [52]
               for heavily calcified lesions, with success rates ≥ 90% and a low incidence of procedural complications and
               out-of-hospital Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) . Despite these procedural premises, studies did
                                                               [53]
               not demonstrate a lower rate of long-time mortality or target lesion revascularization (TLR) with the use of
               mechanical debulking compared to conventional balloon intervention , thus slowing down the diffusion of
                                                                          [54]
               this technique at the beginning of the new millennium. The introduction of the first-generation DES led to a
                                                            [55]
               reduction in intrastent restenosis rates below 10% . As a result, interventional cardiologists began to
               confidently treat more and more complex lesions such as tortuous and calcific vessels percutaneously, thus
               showing a renewed interest in atherectomy techniques, revisited, however, from a more modern perspective
               in order to obtain an optimal preparation of the vessel rather than and extensive plaque debulking. In the
               current era of 2nd and 3rd generation DES, RA is used as a technique for modifying heavy CAC to increase
               the number of lesions suitable for PCI and optimizing procedural results rather than as a technique aimed at
               preventing restenosis , in a strategy known as "Rota-stent". In the first decade of the 2000s, RA confirmed
                                 [56]
               excellent results in terms of procedural success , even if this hardly translated into a consistent long-term
                                                       [57]
               benefit in terms of restenosis and MACE [58-60] . Indeed, the 2018 ESC/EACTS (European Society of
               Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery) guidelines on myocardial revascularization
               only mention, without providing a clear recommendation, the use of RA in selected lesions, in particular
               markedly calcific ones, in order to adequately dilate the lesions before stent implantation . In patients
                                                                                              [61]
               undergoing PCI, RA is currently used in less than 5% of cases , excluding some high-volume centers in
                                                                     [62]
               North America where the prevalence of use exceeds 10% .
                                                              [63]
               Technical fundamentals of Rotational Atherectomy
               The Rotablator system (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, Boston, MA, USA) is the most widely used
               atherectomy device in current interventional practice for the treatment of calcified atherosclerotic lesions in
               the coronary arteries. It consists of an elliptical-shaped diamond-coated metal burr that rotates at very high
               speed and, advancing into the coronary lumen, acts as an abrasive surface against the calcified plaque. The
               burr is available in diameters ranging from 1.25 to 2.5 mm and is mounted on a transmission shaft
               (advancer) connected to a system that converts compressed gas into rotational energy. The burr size should
               be chosen according to a burr-to-artery ratio of 0.5-0.6. Commonly, a single 1.5 mm burr represents the
               right compromise to obtain sufficient plaque modification; however, a step-up approach starting with a
               1.25 mm burr up to 1.5 mm or 1.75 mm burr might be a safer strategy if no budget constraints are present.
               The burr advances on a dedicated 0.009” guidewire (Rotawire, Boston Scientific) while being constantly
               irrigated with a solution that cools and lubricates it. Most procedures can be safely performed with the
               Floppy Rotawire, which has a long tapered shaft allowing greater flexibility and facilitating lesion crossing,
               while the Extra Support Rotawire, with its shorter tapered shaft, may be useful for aorto-ostial lesions as it
               provides more support to maximize vessel straightening and device delivery. New, more-performing wires
               will be available soon. The recent RotaPro system (Boston Scientific) represents an updated and simplified
               version of the RA system, offering an improved visual interface and new electronic controls integrated into
               the device. The advancement of the metal burr rotating at high speed against a calcified plaque determines
               its mechanical ablation and its structural modification according to the principles of “differential cutting”
               and orthogonal “displacement” of the friction, while sparing adjacent non-calcifying tissue . Differential
                                                                                             [64]
               cutting is the ability to ablate one type of material while saving another with a different substrate
               composition. With this mechanism, the rotating burr preferably ablates the inelastic atherosclerotic plaque
               (in its fibrotic and calcific components) without exerting a traumatic action on the adjacent wall of the
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31