Page 24 - Read Online
P. 24

Page 6 of 22                   Andò et al. Vessel Plus 2023;7:15  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.26

               The position of the imaging catheter (IVUS or OCT) with respect to an eccentric calcified plaque may also
               help in predicting the impact of the rotational atherectomy burr on the plaque. For example, if the imaging
               catheter is in contact with the wall opposite to that in which the greater calcific component is present, with a
               larger caliber burr than initially foreseen, it will be possible to obtain greater contact between the device
               itself and the calcific plaque, and therefore greater efficacy in calcium ablation . Finally, intravascular
                                                                                     [36]
               imaging plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of the result of stenting and OCT has a much greater
               sensitivity than IVUS in detecting stent malapposition or under-expansion and in appreciating the effects of
               post-dilatation [35,37,38] .

               TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI)
               OF HEAVILY CALCIFIC CORONARY LESIONS
               Vascular access, guiding catheters, and guidewires
               PCI of heavily calcified lesions requires careful planning. Femoral access may be considered in situations
               which may require a lumen guide catheter greater than 6 French (F, 1F = 0.3 mm), especially in the presence
               of small-caliber radial arteries or in case of extremely tortuous coronaries, in which may be necessary
               increased support afforded by the femoral approach. However, in current practice, PCI for calcified lesions
               is performed indifferently by both radial and femoral arterial access, with the obvious advantages associated
               with radial access in terms of risk of complications [39,40] . Extremely thin-walled radial sheaths are now
               available to allow a 7F guide catheter to be held in the inner lumen while having an outer diameter equal to
               that of a 6F sheath (GlideSheath Slender, Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Alternatively, a sheathless guiding
               catheter may be used, which does not require a percutaneous introducer, and which has a 7.5F internal
               working lumen with a smaller outer diameter than a 6F radial introducer (EauCath, ASAHI Intecc, Aichi,
               Japan). For rotational atherectomy with a burr larger than 1.5 mm or when the coronary anatomy is
               particularly complex, it is always good practice to use a guide catheter with a lumen greater than 6F, but a
               1.75 burr can be used with 6F guide catheters without important limitations. For guidewire selection, it is
               preferable to use non-hydrophilic guides (e.g., Hi-Torque Balance Middleweight, Abbott Vascular, Santa
               Clara, CA, USA or Sion Blue, ASAHI Intecc or Runthrough NS, Terumo Corp.), as they provide better
               tactile feedback, thereby reducing the risk of sub-intimal passage of the guidewire or coronary dissection. If
               these guidewires are ineffective in crossing the calcified lesion, hydrophilic guidewires such as Sion (ASAHI
               Intecc) and Runtrough NS Hypercoat (Terumo Corp.) or polymeric guidewires such as Pilot 50 (Abbott
               Vascular) or Fielder FC can be used (ASAHI Intecc). The use of a balloon catheter or a micro-catheter can
               provide greater support and control of the guidewire and facilitate passage through the calcified lesion,
               especially if it is functionally occlusive.


               Lesion preparation
               Severely calcified lesions must be accurately prepared for stent implantation. In most cases, the difficulty in
               advancing the devices across the calcified lesion and the high risk of stent under-expansion require
               extensive plaque modification. Thus, it is intuitive that calcified lesions cannot be treated with direct stent
               implantation. The techniques available for the treatment of calcifications can be classified into two groups
                                                                     [36]
               [Table 1]: “balloon-based” techniques and “ablative” techniques .  The aim of “balloon-based” techniques
               is not to ablate calcium but to increase plaque compliance, therefore allowing for optimal stent expansion.
               The “ablative” techniques include Rotational Atherectomy (RA), Orbital Atherectomy (OA) and Excimer
               Laser Coronary Atherectomy (ELCA) and theoretically determine the removal (debulking) of the
               calcifications, with the aim of allowing an optimal stent expansion and apposition. IVUS and OCT have
               actually demonstrated that the various ablative techniques act mainly by modifying the composition of the
               plaque through their selective action on the calcific component, typically creating micro-fractures in the
               parietal calcifications and dissection flaps, the presence of which is associated with a greater expansion of
               the stent . It is much infrequent to observe effective tissue ablation with evidence of residual craters or
                       [41]
               tunnels [42,43] .
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29