Page 518 - Read Online

Page 4 of 15 Corthouts et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:46 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.97

Brudnicki et al. [18] C Y Y Y N ? Y Y Y ? Y

Liu et al. [17] D Y Y Y N ? Y Y Y ? Y

Zheng et al. [16] C Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y

Chen et al. [15] ? Y Y Y N Y Y N Y ? Y

Khanna et al. [6] D Y Y Y N Y ? Y Y ? Y

Mueller et al. [14] C Y Y Y Y (c) ? Y N Y N Y

Kulewicz et al. [13] ? Y Y Y N ? Y Y Y N Y

Meazzini et al. [12] C Y Y Y Y (b) ? Y Y Y Y Y

Zemann et al. [11] C Y Y Y N N (d) Y N Y ? Y
Table 1. Checklist of methodological quality of included studies

Li et al. [10] D Y Y Y Y (a) Y Y N Y ? Y

Liao et al. [9] D Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y

A. Who was target of the a. How were subjects recruited (randomly, consecutively, database, b. Who was included in and who was excluded from the (1) Selected sample of same population (2) Selected sample of non-syndromic (3) Selected sample of same cleft type B. Was the design of the a. Was another outcome being considered? b. What outcomes were measured and how? (1) Ascertained same cephalostat and method of image prod

Criteria study? others)? study? study sensible? groups reported? valid? controlled?