Page 513 - Read Online
P. 513

Page 12 of 13                            Mirastschijski et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:45  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.44

               Table 2. Summary of outcomes with midline raphe scroti artery island flap
                Pros                                                               Cons
                Simple surgical technique,                                  Penile lymphedema,
                sufficient perfusion due to the presence of two arteries,   wound dehiscence
                intact sensibility due to the presence of cutaneous nerves
                Highly elastic tissue well-suited for size changes during erection  Postoperative compression therapy
                Restoration of micturition                                  Bulkiness,
                Rehabilitation of sexual function                           presence of hair
                Prevention of recurrent buried penis                        Scrotal size reduction,
                Reduction of excessive scrotal tissue                       orchidopexy
                Neo-foreskin                                                Contra-indication: LSC**
                                                                            Recurrence due to neo-foreskin

               **LSC: Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus

               obliterans), a recurrence of the disease was noticed due to restoration of the moist and predisposing milieu
               for this skin disease. In this particular case, a revision with partial excision of the novel flap was indicated
               and the defect was covered with a skin graft.


               In conclusion, the novel neurovascular MiRA island flap is well suited to reconstruct the entire penile
               shaft after tissue loss with restoration of a fully sensitive cutaneous envelope. Due to its abundant vascular
               perfusion via two septal arteries, it is a safe and easily performed surgical technique for a wide range of
               tissue defects of the male genitalia.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Invention of the flap, surgical design in anatomical studies: Mirastschijski U
               Surgical procedures in patients: Mirastschijski U, Schwenke C
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, performed data analysis,
               interpretation and acquisition, provided administrative, technical and material support, writing the
               manuscript, corrections and advice: Mirastschijski U, Schwenke C, Schwab I, Buchhorn A, Schmiedl A

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               An informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from each patient. For variation of standard
               surgical procedures, no ethical approval is needed.

               Consent for publication
               A written informed consent for anonymous publication of photographs was obtained from each patient.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.
   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518