Page 180 - Read Online
P. 180

Patel et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:18                                     Plastic and
               DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2019.15                                   Aesthetic Research




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Flap reconstruction of the abdominal wall


               Sneha Patel, Alexander F. Mericli, Sahil K. Kapur, Margaret S. Roubaud, Charles E. Butler
               Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

               Correspondence to: Dr. Alexander F. Mericli, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer
               Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. E-mail: afmericli@mdanderson.org
               How to cite this article: Patel S, Mericli AF, Kapur SK, Roubaud MS, Butler CE. Flap reconstruction of the abdominal wall. Plast
               Aesthet Res 2020;7:18. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2019.15
               Received: 26 Aug 2019    First Decision: 24 Mar 2020    Revised: 31 Mar 2020    Accepted: 10 Apr 2020    Published: 17 Apr 2020

               Science Editor: Raúl González-García    Copy Editor: Jing-Wen Zhang    Production Editor: Tian Zhang

               Abstract
               Large abdominal cutaneous defects may occur in association with complex ventral hernias, trauma, tumor
               resection, necrotizing infections or septic evisceration. Soft tissue reconstruction of the abdominal wall is
               performed when there is insufficient adipocutaneous tissue to permit standard, primary closure. A number of
               reconstructive techniques are available, the choice of which is based on a number of factors, including the size
               and location of the defect, etiology, and timing of closure. In general, local fasciocutaneous advancement flaps and
               adjacent tissue rearrangement are the workhorse techniques, followed by regional myocutaneous flaps and free
               tissue transfers for the most complex and extensive of defects. Herein, we describe our approach to abdominal
               soft tissue reconstruction, indications, technical nuances, and management of complications.

               Keywords: Abdominal wall reconstruction, surgical flaps, pedicled flap, free flap, bioprosthetic mesh, hernia,
               reconstructive surgical procedures



               INTRODUCTION
               Abdominal wall defects can occur in association with ventral hernias, trauma, tumors, infections or septic
               evisceration. The abdominal wall is best conceptualized as a trilaminar structure, with each layer serving
               a specific purpose: the muscular layer provides dynamic support and function, the fascial layer confers
               strength and durability, and the skin and subcutaneous tissue serves as a barrier to infection and provides
               a uniform, aesthetic contour. In abdominal wall reconstruction, each layer must be addressed and repaired
               to obtain an optimal result. Contemporary methods of abdominal wall reconstruction emphasize synthetic
               or bioprosthetic mesh for fascial repair and reinforcement, primary myofascial coaptation for a functional,
               durable and dynamic repair, and a variety of soft tissue flaps and rearrangement techniques to address skin
               deficits.

                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                    www.parjournal.net
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185