Page 178 - Read Online
P. 178

Tanaka et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:17  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.12                                         Page 9 of 10

               in patients undergoing open surgery. Although further comparative studies are needed on emerging
               technologies versus SACS closed curettage, to date, SACS closed curettage should be considered an ideal
               surgical treatment for AO; however, decision-making regarding surgical treatment options for AO is
               affected by other factors, such as dressing discomfort, recovery time, scar formation, and cost. Our results
               should be helpful for both surgeons and patients.



               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study: Tanaka R, Morioka D, Akamine S,
               Kadomatsu K
               Performed data analysis and interpretation: Tanaka R, Shimizu T
               Performed data acquisition: Tanaka R, Morioka D


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               The Showa University Hospital institutional research board approved this study (approval no. 2928).


               Consent for publication
               Written consent was obtained for publication for patient images.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Morioka D, Ohkubo F, Amikura Y. Clinical features of axillary osmidrosis: a retrospective chart review of 723 Japanese patients. J
                   Dermatol 2013;40:384-8.
               2.   Lee JC, Kuo HW, Chen CH, Juan WH, Hong HS, et al. Treatment for axillary osmidrosis with suction-assisted cartilage shaver. Br J Plast
                   Surg 2005;58:223-7.
               3.   Morioka D, Nomura M, Lan L, Tanaka R, Kadomatsu K. Axillary osmidrosis: past, present, and future. Ann Plast Surg 2019; Epub ahead
                   of print. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002111.
               4.   Wang C, Wu H, Du F, Le S, Zheng S. Axillary osmidrosis treatment using an aggressive suction-curettage technique: a clinical study on
                   paired control. Aesthet Plast Surg 2015;39:608-15.
               5.   Yang HH, Miao Y, Chen YT, Hu ZQ. Minimally invasive approaches to axillary osmidrosis treatment: a comparison between superficial
                   liposuction with automatic shaver curettage, subcutaneous laser treatment, and microwave-based therapy with a modified technique. J
                   Cosmet Dermatol 2018;18:594-601.
               6.   Inaba M, Ezaki T. New instrument for hircismus and hyperhidrosis operation: subcutaneous tissue shaver. Plast Reconstr Surg
                   1977;59:864-6.
               7.   Skoog T, Thyresson N. Hyperhidrosis of the axillae, a method of surgical treatment. Acta Chir Scand 1962;124:531-8.
               8.   Li ZR, Sun CW, Zhang JY, Qi YQ, Hu JZ. Excision of apocrine glands with preservation of axillary superficial fascia for the treatment of
                   axillary bromhidrosis. Dermatol Surg 2015;41:640-4.
               9.   Dai Y, Xu AE, He J. A refined surgical treatment modality for bromhidrosis: Subcutaneous scissor with micropore. Dermatol Ther
                   2017;30:e12484.
               10.  Liu Q, Zhou Q, Song Y, Yang S, Zheng J, et al. Surgical subcision as a cost-effective and minimally invasive treatment for axillary
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183